Race quotas, politics led to falling Malaysian University standards

Malaysian University standards have fallen and institutions has been kept at a disadvantage because of race-based admission quotas and political interference in university management. 

In contrast, Singapore’s decision to prioritise research, keeping English as the medium of instruction and a merit-based admissions policy have all contributed to the success of the Universites of Singapore’s success, according to “The Road to Academic Excellence,” which studies what contributes to a world-class research university.

The study also noted that Malaysian secondary school students are not well prepared for tertiary education.
It points out that the Malaysian education system promotes rote learning, conformity and uniformity rather than fresh and creative thinking.

Salmi, a Moroccan education economist attached to the World Bank, also notes that “disturbing political developments, from the burning of churches to the whipping of a woman for drinking beer in public,” also cast a shadow on Malaysia’s “image as an open and tolerant society.”

“In contrast, after 1970, Malaysian institutional goals reflected the New Economic Policy, an affirmative action plan for ethnic Malays and indigenous groups, put in place in the wake of disastrous 1969 ethnic riots that took the lives of hundreds of people on both sides of the racial divide.

Apart from the student quota system, NEP translated into more scholarships to Bumiputeras, special programmes to facilitate their entry into higher education institutions, and the use of the Malay language in place of English in the entire education system by 1983.

“In Malaysian universities and in government, the policy impact spiralled upward so that Bumiputera staff members, over time, secured almost all senior management, administrative, and academic positions.

“As Singapore universities kept pace with the demands of a growing economy that sought to become competitive internationally, with English continuing as the language of instruction and research, Malaysian universities began to focus inward as proficiency in English declined in favour of the national language Bahasa Malaysia and the New Economic Policy’s social goals took precedence.”

There has been widespread recognition that the implementation of affirmative action policies in Malaysia has hurt the higher education system, sapping Malaysia’s economic competitiveness and driving some (mainly Chinese and Indians) to more meritocratic countries, such as Singapore.

This is important element in the making of a world-class university, as well as top-grade talent.

“The difference between a good university and great university comes down to talent.”

No comments: