It is becoming more and more difficult to maintain that sort of open mind when dealing with the Barisan Nasional regime in Malaysia these days. I just cannot see how this government adequately represents Malaysians, to say nothing of Malaysian aspirations.
The complaints about racial divisions in BN are overdone; the market in propounding that line of thinking is oversaturated. If you can't see how BN divides Malaysians by trying to be all things to all people — racists to racists, liberals to liberals, fundamentalists to fundamentalists — I suggest you take a long hard look at the situation here and try to think about it.
Instead, let's just look at whether BN is even good at doing what it claims — representing all communities fairly and equally in the government. This has always been its major selling point, and has always been something it is consistent about (for the most part).
There isn't much greater consensus among the non-Malay communities on anything other than the issues of religious freedom and ethnic genocide (at the natural expense of the Constitution): we don't like what the Malay ultras are up to. Heck, a lot of Malays — in other words, many Malaysians, regardless of race — aren't comfortable with suppressing freedom of conscience or the right to live and love despite being a non-Malay.
So when was the last time you heard the government commit itself to religious freedom — to not tear down religious buildings heavyhandedly, to not stonewall applications to build new houses of worship — or to prevent genocide?
You might think it ought to be understood that the government will never do that because, hey, there are a lot of non-Malays and concerned Malays in it, right? But why is it that when our Members of Parliament have a chance to speak out against Malay supremacists who threaten to abrogate the Constitution and foment ethnic genocide, they don't?
Why is it that when our cabinet ministers submit a memorandum to the Prime Minister calling for greater religious freedom, they are forced to retract their statement? Why is our Deputy Prime Minister the same man who, 20 years ago, threatened to spill the blood of Malaysian citizens, and why has our Education Minister continually brandished his keris in the same context, with the same connotations?
There are a lot of good people in Barisan Nasional. They know what the country's problems are, and how the government can help. Some of them, like Rais Yatim, have even written whole books (and pretty good ones at that) about them.
So what's holding them back from taking a stand? Why aren't they voicing the sentiments of Malaysians and the Malaysian communities threatened by the reckless position of individuals within the ruling regime?
Simple — because Barisan Nasional is nothing more than UMNO and a bunch of its dogs. That's not even close to correct — Barisan Nasional is nothing more than corrupt politicians looking to rape the country, and piggybacking on the tailormade divisive agendas of the different component parties to make their dreams of plunder a reality, and on the innocent party members and grassroots politicians trying to make a difference.
Of course, that's not a very pleasant thing to say. But can you deny that it is anything other than the truth? You can't deny that we aren't a democracy. You can't deny that the government routinely hands out billion-ringgit contracts to companies with paid-up capital in the thousands.
In short, why shouldn't we describe Barisan Nasional as the least Malaysian party out there? If democracy is what we want, if a clean country is what we want, if a country where we don't have politicians and government officials speaking of genocide if they can't have their way is what we want, then why is Barisan Nasional supposedly representative of who we are?
excerpts from Infernal Ramblings
Hi. I am non-Muslim. We are going to discuss Malaysia. In Malaysia it may be possible that most of the beneficiaries of public assistance are Malays. But most of the have-nots are also Malays and the natives of Sabah and Sarawak. I have no problems with this. We want a no Malaysian left behind Malaysia. Both Malays and non-Malays have to live in Malaysia. We should not take a tough stand. The art of compromising is just as important. So, read on.
ReplyDeleteEven a journey of a thousand miles starts with one step. If I may add a right step, please read on.
There is a quest for equality by non-Malays on the one hand and there is a fear of losing their special status among Malays on the other hand. So we have to reach a happy medium.
Many decades ago, the Muslim Malays were mostly sarong-clad; and at that time, when any Muslim Malay broke ranks and wore long pants and shirt, he would be considered pro-Western and thus a traitor by the Muslim Malay community. If you used silver ware like forks and spoons to eat food, you risk being called a traitor too. Later on, even if you ate burgers and hot dogs, you risk being branded pro-Western and a traitor. Commercially available disposable menstrual pads are also a Western idea and I bet is used by both Western and Eastern females today. Today, Malaysia, the country of my birth, is on the verge of becoming a developed nation. Unfortunately, the Malays do not credit the non-Malays adequately for their contribution to Malaysia’s growth and development. I, personally, have helped to build a hydro-electric dam in Perak, which will out live me. It was in the early 1980’s. The dam will continue to give out electricity to many generations to come. The photographs I took of the dam building continue to be my pride and joy. Like all construction industry, some workers died. Yes, I have served Malaysia in my own way. I am almost inclined to call the dam, my dam. Yes, it is my dam. It’s my gift to Malaysia. Despite that, I never asked for first class citizenship status. I only asked for religious equality. I only asked for changing faith is an inviolable human right. Some Malays feel that since they gave citizenship to non-Malays, the non-Malays must be willing to accept second-class status. My position is that, I am willing to accept second or whatever class status provided we separate Malay from Islam. We must be allowed to espouse secularism and liberalism. We have to recognize secularism and liberalism as another faith. Islam has no right to have a special status in Malaysia. No religion has the right to use political power and enforcement. Religions no longer have a monopoly over truth and knowledge. Changing faith is an inviolable human right.
It is pretty obvious that we have to increase the bi-racial population of Malaysia in order to stabilize the nation. Increasing the bi-racial population has nothing to do with political power. However, the politicians can remove obstacles to increase the bi-racial population. The obstacle is the special status for Islam in Malaysia. Currently, if Muslims and non-Muslims want to marry, then both have to convert to Islam or leave the country. This is the obstacle. If Muslim Malaysians are allowed to leave Islam, then there may be more marriages between Muslims and non-Muslims. Changing faith is an inviolable human right. If we support changing faith is an inviolable human right, then we are supporting Bangsa Malaysia.
In addition there is another matter to deal with. We do have, in Malaysia, a Department of Religious Affairs, but it is exclusively for Islam. Islam has no right to have a special status in Malaysia. To counterbalance the Department of Islamic Affairs, we now need a Department of non-Muslim Affairs. The Islamic issues can be taken care of by the Department of Religious (Islamic) Affairs, while the Department of non-Muslim Affairs will take care of issues regarding non-Muslims. Then, both Muslims and non-Muslims can co-exist. You see, I never asked for first class status. I only asked for religious equality.
We may need a constitutional amendment to create two kinds of Malays: Muslim Malays and non-Muslim Malays.
As far as I know public assistance programs alone cannot address the problem of disparity between the Malays and non-Malays. The public assistance programs of pre-1970’s was not successful. So from 1970-1990 they had the New Economic Policy which is also not successful and therefore there is a desire to continue it beyond 1990. Now some people want to introduce the Malaysian Economic Agenda. I have my reservations after so many failures. Therefore I say, try bi-racial. Many bi-racials have gotten ahead. While the public assistance to the needy continues, let us hope that the number of bi-racials increase too. That is, we should have a two-pronged attack to solve this problem of social and economic disparity between the Malays and non-Malays: on the one hand we should continue public assistance for the needy, and on the other hand we should amend the constitution to create two kinds of Malays (Muslim Malays and non-Muslim Malays) so that the number of bi-racials would increase. Trust me when I tell you that many bi-racials have gotten ahead. If the economic and social disparity between Malays and non-Malays continues, then ethnic jokes will continue which is unhealthy. The solution is, try bi-racial.
Step by step the non-Malays should claim full citizenship rights. In the mean time, most of the public assistance should continue to be given to the have-nots, who are mostly the Malays and the natives of Sabah and Sarawak. This is the art of compromise.
By the way, there are advantages for being bi-racial. Many bi-racials have gotten ahead. In fact, Dr.Mahathir is bi-racial. Apparently his birth name is Mahathir s/o Iskandar Kutty. Please do go to website http://www.malaysianindian1.blogspot.com/ and read a posting entitled Mahathir s/o Iskandar Kutty @ Mahathir bin Mohamed. There is another posting in the same website to read entitled The Indian-Muslim opportunists in Umno
Yes, there are advantages for being bi-racial, and some of them have gotten ahead.