1) You put forward the motion to refer Anwar Ibrahim to the committee in April 2010.
2) The Apco letter, which had been used to justify Anwar's suspension, was dated Aug 19, 2010.
3) You (not the rights and privileges committee) received Robert Shrum's letter only last week, meaning, the committee had not yet received this letter when they recommended to suspend Anwar.
4) Now you are telling the world you have proof that Anwar lied.
It looks very obvious to me that when you moved in Parliament to refer Anwar to the committee these two 'documents', which you now refer to, were never in your hands at that time. So, four months before Apco's letter was received, you already decided Anwar was guilty.
In your court or Najib's court, Anwar could never win. You are shifting the goal post just to nail him. Has Najib asked you to lie for him, too?
Is Apco trying to say that PM Najib Razak was the one who concocted the 1Malaysia concept by himself? Then, what the heck was Apco paid for? To come up with what then?
Malaysian affidavit? Anyone still recognises it? With the PI (private investigator) P Balasubramaniam affidavit and the 1,001 affidavits which the police don't take action on, who cares for another one from Apco?
What do you expect Apco to do? Admit it?
2) The Apco letter, which had been used to justify Anwar's suspension, was dated Aug 19, 2010.
3) You (not the rights and privileges committee) received Robert Shrum's letter only last week, meaning, the committee had not yet received this letter when they recommended to suspend Anwar.
4) Now you are telling the world you have proof that Anwar lied.
It looks very obvious to me that when you moved in Parliament to refer Anwar to the committee these two 'documents', which you now refer to, were never in your hands at that time. So, four months before Apco's letter was received, you already decided Anwar was guilty.
In your court or Najib's court, Anwar could never win. You are shifting the goal post just to nail him. Has Najib asked you to lie for him, too?
Is Apco trying to say that PM Najib Razak was the one who concocted the 1Malaysia concept by himself? Then, what the heck was Apco paid for? To come up with what then?
Malaysian affidavit? Anyone still recognises it? With the PI (private investigator) P Balasubramaniam affidavit and the 1,001 affidavits which the police don't take action on, who cares for another one from Apco?
What do you expect Apco to do? Admit it?
No comments:
Post a Comment