How many of you would believe that a seven-year-old child could whip up a
fantasy of having been raped when she was aged four? And that too after
watching pornography?
No one I am sure except the judge who threw out the case against a
49-year-old kindergarten operator. In March, a Sessions Court sentenced
Ewe Peng Lip to 20 years in jail and ten strokes of the cane.
High Court judge Zamani Abdul Rahim overturned the judgment and said the
child's testimony had discrepancies. The testimonies of her mother and
grandmother were not accepted as they were based on what the victim had
told them.
Zamani also ruled that there was no proof of penile penetration and it
was "common knowledge" that children find it hard to differentiate fact
from fantasy.
"We must not forget who is involved in this rape allegation, even if she
is an adult, in which women have a tendency to exaggerate about a
sexual act" - these were the words of the learned judge.
NO respect for women
And his words are demeaning to women and girls. Zamani clearly has no respect for women.
If we do nothing to register our contempt for this judgment, it will
only show that the society we live in has no regards for women. It will
only show that the society we live in has no qualms if women and
children are treated like sexual objects. It will only show that the
society we live in has no moral conscience or backbone. It will only
show that the society we live in will not think twice about victimizing
women and children.
This ruling makes me cringe. But more importantly it makes me fear for
the safety of other children as the perpetrator is a kindergarten owner
and has access to other kids, as he is now free.
The ruling also raises pertinent questions:
1. Why did a male gynecologist (Dr Malkeet Singh) examine the child?
2. Was a psychologist/ counselor/psychiatrist or any other mental health expert present during the vaginal examination?
3. Did the judge order the court for a
psychologist/counselor/psychiatrist or any other mental health expert to
be present when the child was questioned?
4. Were special tools, like drawings by the child or specially
formulated questions, used before arriving at the conclusion that the
child was fantasizing she was raped?
5. Did a psychologist/counselor/psychiatrist or any other mental health expert analyze the child's statement?
6. Did the judge take into account that Ewe could possibly be a
pedophile? And if he is one, and he is now free, he could prey on other
children? And that it would only be a matter of time before he decides
to indulge himself again?
What is happening to M'sia
Let's look at the statistics now:
1. In 2010, there were 1,777 cases of rape out of which 214 cases
involved victims under the age of 12. And in 1,563 cases the victims
were between the ages of 13 and 15.
2. In 2011, there were 1,652 cases out of which 202 cases involved
victims under the age of 12. And 1,450 cases the victims were between
the ages of 13 and 15.
3. As of July this year, 859 statutory rape cases were reported. This
involved 109 cases of girls under 12 and 750 cases of girls between the
ages of 13 and 15.
We
all know that usually the number of unreported cases of rape and sexual
abuse are double. And many of such cases go unreported. So please let's
not even try to satisfy ourselves that we are a fine society just
because the numbers seem to be on the decrease. Instead let's look at
how many of these child victims had justice delivered to them.
What is becoming of this country and its judiciary that we could have
such a ruling after two equally outrageous court judgments which created
an uproar among the people? And despite Attorney-General Abdul Gani
Patail's statement that rape offenders need to be severely punished?
National bowler Noor Afizal Azizan who raped a 13-year-old girl when he
was 19 and electrician Chuah Guan Jiu, 21, who raped a 12-year-old
escaped imprisonment.
They were both bound over for RM25,000 on good behavior. Noor Afizal's
custodial sentence by a Sessions Court was set aside because he has a
"bright future".
These recent rulings are enough to warrant a review of the laws on
statutory rape. And it must be done at the next Parliament sitting which
begins on September 24th for its clear that the existing laws are
incapable of protecting children and in turn are used to further
victimize them.
Charles Santiago is the DAP Member of Parliament for Klang
No comments:
Post a Comment