UMNO's dominance is the largest threat to the survival of democracy in Malaysia.

“A tyrannical government is more fearful than tigers” – Malaysians’ interests can be best protected by reducing the strength of UMNO’s allies and agents in MCA and Gerakan to send out an important message of rejecting UMNO’s dominance and its unfair and divisive policies

MCA President should explain how Malaysians can break or reduce UMNO’s dominance in government that has not only created injustice, denial of fundamental human rights, national disunity but also breeds corruption and abuses of power. We have seen that “A tyrannical government is more fearful than tigers”.

Malaysians’ interests can be best protected by reducing the strength of UMNO’s allies such as MCA and Gerakan to send out an important message of rejecting UMNO’s dominance and its unfair and divisive policies. It is sad that instead of working with the people to break or reduce UMNO’s dominance, MCA has chosen to continue supporting UMNO.

It is not just UMNO’s failed policies such as the discriminatory New Economic Policy but also divisive policies of establishing an Islamic state, denial of fundamental human rights freedoms including freedom of religion, tolerance of corruption, refusal to share the country’s wealth to reduce the hardships of inflation, failure to combat crime and lack of respect for the rule of law that has disturbed and angered many Malaysians.

Malaysians are also unhappy that UMNO leaders who do not respect the rights of minorities, women or rule of law continue to be selected as wakil rakyats. Amongst the controversial assemblymen likely to be fielded again are Umno's Port Klang Assemblyman Datuk Zakaria Md Deros and Cempaka Assemblyman Datuk Mad Aris Mad Yusuf. Zakaria had extraordinary wealth in excess of his allowance as Assemblyman which enabled to build a mansion in Klang without the approval of the local authorities and had defaulted on assessment payments for more than 10 years whilst Mad Aris is allegedly involved in at least eight land deals.

Or the Penang Deputy Chief Minister Dato Haji Abdul Rashid bin Abdullah for ordering the destruction of a Chinese temple. Other UMNO MPs likely to be fielded again by BN are those who called women having to go through their monthly periods as “bocor’ or UMNO Jasin MP Datuk Mohd Said asking Customs Department to close one eye in carrying out its duties? Instead of opposing such disreputable leaders, Ong Ka Ting and MCA in the spirit of BN still supported UMNO.

So dominating is UMNO that even MCA Vice-President Datuk Dr Fong Chan Onn publicly concedes that UMNO and MCA are not equals but UMNO is the “boss” whilst MCA is a mere No. 2.

UMNO’s dominance is the largest threat to the survival of democracy in Malaysia. The last occasion the people reduced the votes or seats obtained by UMNO’s allies in MCA and Gerakan in the 2008 general elections, made an about a U turn but UMNO still haven not learnt lesson well enough and never listen to the rakyat.

Malaysian Chinese
via email

2 comments:

Diversity Dude said...

In the 2004 elections (11th General Election), the voters gave good support to Mr.Abdullah Badawi. But reforms did not come. Why? Probably because UMNO had done well in the elections. If UMNO had done well in the elections, then the election results tell UMNO that the voters are satisfied with the status quo. If the voters are satisfied with UMNO, then no reforms are necessary. In the 2008 elections (12th General Elections), UMNO did not do well, but she managed to win. UMNO did lose the 2/3 majority in the Parliament, but she did win, nevertheless. Will UMNO undertake reforms now? I would not be surprised if she did not. Why should she? UMNO is still the winner in the elections; and she can plan to rise and may even succeed to rise again. So, as long as she wins, she will never undertake the reforms. So, how do the voters get the reforms that they need? The voters will get the reforms when UMNO is completely defeated in the 13th General Elections. If UMNO wins zero seats in the next elections (13th General Elections), then some other party would have to rule Malaysia. Let us call it Party B. If UMNO is completely defeated in the next elections (13th General Elections), then Party B would rule Malaysia. Would Party B undertake reforms? If Party B does not undertake reforms, then voters would know what to do.

So, the next step for Malaysians is to completely defeat UMNO in the next elections.

Diversity Dude said...

Please support the abolishing of the Internal Security Act (ISA) of Malaysia. If you go to www.google.com and type the words INTERNAL SECURITY ACT MALAYSIA, you would be able to read up more about it. You could also go to www.youtube.com and type the words INTERNAL SECURITY ACT MALAYSIA, and be able to see and learn more.


The UMNO government has used the ISA numerous times. I want to make it clear that it is not the Barisan Nasional (BN) government, but the UMNO government. It is not the government, but UMNO. Barisan Nasional is a coalition of unequals, not equals. UMNO is the big brother in BN. Therefore UMNO must be held responsible; and more importantly, UMNO must not be allowed to hide behind the BN banner. UMNO is the enemy, not BN. Thus, each time the ISA is used, the responsibility lays squarely on UMNO.