Do feel free to provide suggestions, ideas, comments, complaints or articles. Thank you

EMAIL:
malaysianindian1@gmail.com

To post comments, you need not log in to the Google account, just click Anonymous.


The REAL 1MALAYSIA SONG

Malaysian Indian Ethnic Cleansing by UMNO led government

KEEP VOTING FOR BN, THIS SORT OF LIFE YOU HAVE INSTORE FOR YOUR CHILDREN? VOTE FOR A CHANGE

Re-Introduce Ration Card System to show government's sincerity in helping the poor.

Event: 16/2/2010, 2nd year Anniversary HINDRAF Rose Campaign.

In rememberence of the Rose Rally 2008, we will have a prayers at the Court Malai Pillayar Temple, Puduraya, KL on 16.2.2010 at 7.30pm.

Please join.

“Valga HINDRAF Makkal Sakthi”
Thanks & Regards
K.Selvam
HINDRAF/HRP Selangor.

political secretary to Minister in Prime Minister’s Department, Nor Mohamed Yackop nabbed with RM2 million in his apartment

KUALA LUMPUR – Following the nabbing of a political secretary – with RM2mil stashed at an apartment he was staying at near Butterworth – the attention now would surely turn to the senior minister he is working for.

Several clues point to the suspect being Hasbie Sattar, the political secretary to Minister in Prime Minister’s Department, Nor Mohamed Yackop, who is in charge of the Economic Planning Unit.

The fourth floor unit of the Sri Molek apartment was said to have been rented by the minister’s election team weeks before the March 8, 2008 general election and later used as a transit home for the minister’s staff.

The apartment is located at Teluk Air Tawar, on the fringes of the Tasek Gelugor parliamentary constituency, where Nor is the MP.

Besides the money – stacked in bundles of RM5, RM10, RM50 and RM100 – anti-graft officers who raided the place also seized a 4WD vehicle registered under the name of a Pulau Tikus-based company and a BMW registered in the name of a person from Sarawak.

Coincidentally, Hasbie is a Sarawakian.

Pol sec since Abdullah's tenure as PM

He was appointed Nor’s political secretary during Abdullah’s tenure as PM and followed him to the Prime Minister’s Department after Najib took over the helm of the country in April last year.

Two months ago, there were speculative reports that the political secretary was under the scrutiny of the Malaysian Anti-Corruption Commission for corruption and abuse of power.

He had reportedly a ‘substantial but unaccountable assets’ in his possession, which include luxury cars and homes.

The MACC, at that time, had reportedly obtained an order to freeze several of the properties as well as his bank accounts to facilitate investigations under the Anti Money Laundering Act.

It was also said to be focusing on alleged kickbacks received from the approval of several multi-million ringgit projects.

It is believed several of the properties seized were under the names of people believed to be proxies for the political secretary, and investigators are expected to question people whose names are registered as owners.

At this moment, there is neither talk nor reports that Nor too is being investigated. No doubt, however, there would be quarters also calling for a probe into the minister.

Prior to winning the Tasek Gelugor parliamentary seat, he was a Senator and the Finance Minister II under the administration of former prime minister Abdullah Ahmad Badawi.

In such position, one could imagine how close the minister was at the pulse point of approving projects and numerous fund allocations.

One can also imagine that current Finance Minister I and Prime Minister Najib Abdul Razak is in a precarious situation now about whether or not to retain Nor in the EPU or take some credible steps to clean any mess that could possibly surface arising from the arrest of the political secretary.

Pledge to wipe out graft

Abdullah, in his time, had said he wanted to wipe out corruption from among Malaysians and went on to give more ‘teeth’ to anti-corruption officers by setting up the MACC. This also paved the way for Najib to continue with the job – which has already borne some fruits and, along the way, some controversies.

While most Malaysians want to see the MACC doing its job without fear, favour and prejudice, there had been question marks about its mode of investigations and Najib has ordered a royal commission of inquiry into the matter following the death of political aide Teoh Beng Hock.

By now, most people already know that Teoh had been questioned by MACC officers before he was found dead on July 16 at the fifth floor of a Shah Alam building, The Plaza Masalam building houses the Selangor’s MACC’s office on the 14th floor.

In the Teluk Air Tawar case, it is learnt that the MACC officers had grilled the suspect, together with two service staff, for five hours into how the RM2mil had been accumulated and kept at the apartment.

If the probe provides strong evidence that there is ‘hanky panky ‘ within the PM’s Department and Najib shows his courage to throw the book at the culprits – no matter what their positions are – it would surely boost his image as being a prime minister earnestly intent to wipe out all shades of graft in his administration.

The tiger has struck

In the decades of being an independent nation, there had been consistent calls by the rakyat for corrupt leaders - political, corporate and others – to be weeded out so that integrity remains intact among Malaysians.

Ironically, the political secretary’s case had come at the start of the Year of the Tiger. The beast has struck and continues to prowl. How many victims will it maul and prey upon?

Malaysian Mirror
15/02/10

Anwar Ibrahim: Najib, Rosmah, This Country Is Not Yours




15/02/10

Court rejects bid to quash ban on Kg Medan book

511

The Kuala Lumpur High Court today rejected an author’s application to quash the government’s decision to ban his book on the Kampung Medan riots, almost nine years ago.

NONEIn his decision, Justice Mohamad Ariff Md Yusof ruled that the then-deputy home minister’s decision to ban the Tamil language book, titled ‘March 8′, was valid as he (deputy minister) considered that the circulation of the book would be prejudicial to internal security and public order.

He said, the deputy minister in this case, had absolute discretion to exercise the powers of the minister in prohibiting the publication and the printing of the book, after considering views from the police and the ministry that the book would be prejudicial to internal security, and “poison the minds of the readers, especially the Indian community”.

In dismissing the judicial review application, he, however did not order for costs because the case involved public interest.

Mohamed Ariff is the same judge who overturned the banning of the book, ‘Muslim Women and the Challenge of Extremism’ by the home ministry on Jan 25.

He said, each case had different facts of the case, and to arrive at a decision, he had to consider all factors.

Mohamed Ariff said, there was a need for balancing, in exercising the judicial function, and that he also took into account, cultural and sensitivity factors before making the decision.

On Feb 23, 2007, engineer-turned-lawyer K Arumugam filed an application for a judicial review, seeking to declare null and void the order made by the government on Nov 21, 2006, prohibiting the publication, sale and distribution of the book on grounds that it was a threat to national security.

In his application, Arumugam, 51, named the internal security minister and the deputy internal security minister at that time, as well as the Malaysian government, as respondents.

Earlier, Arumugam’s counsel Edward Saw argued that the decision to ban the book was irrational and unreasonable to the right of freedom of expression.

He also said the deputy minister failed to adduce evidence that the circulation of the book could be prejucial to internal security as the book was in circulation with 3,000 copies before it was banned on Nov 21, 2006.

Senior federal counsel Azizah Nawawi had submitted that the deputy minister at that time (Fu Ah Kiaw) had considered all views and information before prohibiting the book’s circulation.

Arumugam, when met by reporters, said he respected the court’s decision and would consult his lawyer on whether to appeal or otherwise.

- Bernama

711611431

MK
15/02/10

PKR dares party quitters to vacate seats

KUALA LUMPUR: PKR has dared five renegade lawmakers, including Bayan Baru MP Datuk Seri Zahrain Mohd Hashim, to resign from their seats to prove that they are upset with the party leadership and its struggles.

PKR election director Fuziah Salleh said the five should allow the electorate decide on their representatives to the state assemblies or parliament. Under current election laws, those who resign their seat cannot stand for re-election.

“I dare Zahrain and all PKR state assemblymen who had left to resign for by-elections to be held,” she told The Malaysian Insider via text message from the United States.

She is there with PAS Parit Buntar MP Mujahid Yusof Rawa and Umno Pulai MP Datuk Nur Jazlan Mohamed for a study trip.

“It is fair for the people to choose a representative that represents the party chosen by the people,” the Kuantan MP said.

Zahrain is the first MP to quit PKR while the assemblymen who have walked out of the party to be Independents are Jamaluddin Mohd Radzi (Behrang), Mohd Osman Jailu (Changkat Jering), Badrul Hisham Abdullah (Pelabuhan Klang) and Mohd. Radzhi Salleh (Lunas).

The Malaysian Insider understands that there is a possibility that five more MPs and a few other assemblymen will announce their resignation from the party within the next two weeks.

Zahrain announced his immediate resignation from PKR on Friday, citing disappointment with the party and a loss of faith with de facto leader Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim.

The former Penang PKR chief was facing a party disciplinary board inquiry for his harsh criticism of Penang chief minister Lim Guan Eng when he decided to turn Independent in Parliament, reducing the Pakatan Rakyat to just 81 in the 222-seat parliament.

Fuziah said Zahrain should realise that he wasn’t elected in Election 2008 because of himself but definitely because he represented PKR.

“Now he is disappointed with the party’s leaders and struggles, so is he willing to quit the seat and not just the party,” Fuziah asked.

She said Zahrain and the four state reps could contest again if the law allowed it to happen.

“If the people want them and they have been doing service well, then they can win if they are Independents.

“Otherwise, if the people choose the party, the only party representatives will win,” she added.

Fuziah also said as party elections director, she will take the responsibility to ensure future candidates have the integrity to vacate their seats if they resign from the party, in a reference to Zahrain’s vow to keep his parliamentary seat until the next general election.

Malaysian Insider
15/02/10

PKR dares party quitters to vacate seats

KUALA LUMPUR: PKR has dared five renegade lawmakers, including Bayan Baru MP Datuk Seri Zahrain Mohd Hashim, to resign from their seats to prove that they are upset with the party leadership and its struggles.

PKR election director Fuziah Salleh said the five should allow the electorate decide on their representatives to the state assemblies or parliament. Under current election laws, those who resign their seat cannot stand for re-election.

“I dare Zahrain and all PKR state assemblymen who had left to resign for by-elections to be held,” she told The Malaysian Insider via text message from the United States.

She is there with PAS Parit Buntar MP Mujahid Yusof Rawa and Umno Pulai MP Datuk Nur Jazlan Mohamed for a study trip.

“It is fair for the people to choose a representative that represents the party chosen by the people,” the Kuantan MP said.

Zahrain is the first MP to quit PKR while the assemblymen who have walked out of the party to be Independents are Jamaluddin Mohd Radzi (Behrang), Mohd Osman Jailu (Changkat Jering), Badrul Hisham Abdullah (Pelabuhan Klang) and Mohd. Radzhi Salleh (Lunas).

The Malaysian Insider understands that there is a possibility that five more MPs and a few other assemblymen will announce their resignation from the party within the next two weeks.

Zahrain announced his immediate resignation from PKR on Friday, citing disappointment with the party and a loss of faith with de facto leader Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim.

The former Penang PKR chief was facing a party disciplinary board inquiry for his harsh criticism of Penang chief minister Lim Guan Eng when he decided to turn Independent in Parliament, reducing the Pakatan Rakyat to just 81 in the 222-seat parliament.

Fuziah said Zahrain should realise that he wasn’t elected in Election 2008 because of himself but definitely because he represented PKR.

“Now he is disappointed with the party’s leaders and struggles, so is he willing to quit the seat and not just the party,” Fuziah asked.

She said Zahrain and the four state reps could contest again if the law allowed it to happen.

“If the people want them and they have been doing service well, then they can win if they are Independents.

“Otherwise, if the people choose the party, the only party representatives will win,” she added.

Fuziah also said as party elections director, she will take the responsibility to ensure future candidates have the integrity to vacate their seats if they resign from the party, in a reference to Zahrain’s vow to keep his parliamentary seat until the next general election.

Malaysian Insider
15/02/10

No heritage for hindu temples.

Whilst at least a few Christian churches, and almost all mosques can be of historical and heritage and in fact even the ruins of a non functioning church can be made a heritage site (refer The Star 23/1/10 at page N33).

But the last Indian Railway settlement in Sentul KL, the Kg Pandan Indian settlement both settlement in Penang Island – Kg Buah Pala, the thousands of hindu temples in the plantations which was the economic backbone of Malaysia, hundreds of Tamil schools hundreds of hindu crematoriums etc are not preserved as the history and heritage of Malaysia.

one-malaysia9In fact on a day to day basis these Indian structures as reported in the Tamil press are either demolished to be demolished or relocated just because it sits on prime land and big monies to be made by both UMNO and also PKR, DAP and PAS as the Indians are the soft targets without much political or economical clout.

heritage1

HRP
15/02/10

Karpal to UMNO govt: ‘Be compassionate, host Dr Shaariibuu’

A tenth of the remains of the murdered Altantuya Shaariibuu were taken on Nov 17, 2006, back to her native Mongolia by her father Dr Shaariibuu Setev for purposes of her burial rites.

It is time, said lawyer Karpal Singh, that the government – on compassionate grounds – host Dr Shaariibuu once more so that he can collect the remaining 90 percent of Altantuya’s remains and complete the last rites in Mongolia to appease her soul.

In a statement, the DAP leader said the Honorary Consul-General of Mongolia in Malaysia Syed Abdul Rahman Al Habshi was informed by the Attorney-General’s Chambers that Altantuya’s remains could be released for the purpose of burial in Mongolia.

Following an enquiry from the Mongolian government, Syed Abdul Rahman had written to Inspector General of Police Musa Hassan asking for the Malaysian government and the Royal Malaysian Police Force to foot the bill for Shaariibuu and a representative’s journey to Malaysia for that purpose.

This enquiry by the foreign and justice ministries of Mongolia arose out of the conviction and sentence to death of chief inspector Azilah Hadri and corporal Sirul Azhar Umar in April, 2009, said Karpal, who said a copy of the request relayed through Syed Abdul Rahman was extended to Attorney-General Abdul Gani Patail .

Since Syed Abdul Rahman’s letter dated Nov 26, 2009, however, there has been no reply from either Musa or Abdul Gani, said Karpal.
Appeasing her spirit

Reiterating the request, Karpal said: The expenses incurred by Dr Shaaribuu and the representative for the purpose of coming to Malaysia to collect Altantuya’s bone fragments will not exceed RM20,000.

I cannot understand why, on compassionate grounds, the request made by the foreign and justice ministries of Mongolia cannot be favourably considered.

The government should not forget that Altantuya met her horrendous death by being blown up by C4 explosives by police personnel while she was in Malaysia. The least that the government can do is to bear the expenses requested, said Karpal.

In the event that the government is unwilling to bear the expenses, Karpal said he would be forced to seek public funds on compassionate grounds to bring and accommodate Dr Shaaribuu in Malaysia to collect his daughters remains.

Until her burial has been completed with the last fragments of her bones, said Karpal, her spirit will not be appeased.

Public interest demands that Malaysia show compassion, he added.

Justice delayed

On a related matter, Karpal criticised the judiciary’s delay in expediting the appeals of Azilah and Sirul Azhar against the death sentence ruled on them by the Shah Alam High court in April last year.

Given chief justice Zaki Azmi’s crusade against delays in the finalisation of trials and appeals in other matters, Karpal said there appears to be an exemption in the Altantuya murder appeal.

Having regard to the international spotlight on the issue, I wold have thought every effort would be made to speed up the appeal (of Azilah and Sirul Azhar) so that the adverse impact on the country could be minimised, and with the spirit of Altantuya being appeased.

The murder trial received overwhelming attention after a close aide of Prime Minister Abdul Razak – Abdul Razak Baginda – was charged with abetting Azilah and Sirul Azhar.

He was, however, later acquitted, and walk out a free man after the court found that the prosecution had failed to furnish adequate proof of conspiracy.

The court’s failure to address the issue of motive, among others, has sparked speculation that greater powers were involved in the case.

Najib has repeatedly denied having any links with the matter.

MK
15/02/10

UMNO has robbed of our memory, and replaced with slogans, but we have also been robbed of our country

2. Y.A.M. Tunku Zain Al-„Abidin’s speech outlines an extraordinary project which combines
a commitment to constitutional democracy with an awareness of its historical context.

3. Tunku Abdul Rahman was the founder of Malaysia. That has been obscured by an intervening period in which his memory has been brushed out of our national consciousness. He brought together a Malaysia that had come together “through our own free will and desire in the true spirit of brotherhood and love of freedom”, in a union arrived at “by mutual consent by debate and discussion…through friendly argument and compromise,” and “in the spirit of cooperation and concord.”

4. This was the basis for Malaysia he worked for and established, and that his life embodied. That basis has been replaced by something alien to it, his memory has been suppressed, and our history revised.

5. Part of the reason our collective memory of Tunku has faded, and that Tunku would not recognise today's Malaysia, is that Tunku and his generation built institutions that empowered the people rather than cults of personality to concentrate power and wealth in themselves. They reached instinctively for democratic decision-making . The concepts and precepts of constitutional democracy were part of their natural vocabulary and instinctive reactions. They knew who the country belonged to, and that they lived to serve.

6. The day of Tunku’s funeral was not even declared a public holiday. It is no accident that the erasure of his memory has gone hand in hand with the erosion of our institutions. Tunku built up a system of good civil service in which ordinary citizens did not need to see so-and-so to get things done. This has been replaced by a domineering style of leadership in which what you get done depends on who you know. Of course the rich and powerful have better connections.

7. In place of the protection for ordinary citizens guaranteed by popular representation, rule of law and the checks and balances of independent institutions, we have the cult of the great leader.
8. In place of a system which designed to assure the rights of the ordinary citizen we have a system re-designed around the interests of corporate and political bosses.

9. Ordinary Malaysians are disenfranchised of their rights to health, education and security. They are then patronised by leaders whose idea of public service is to go around like Father Christmas doling out gifts of resources which are really the property of the people. This turns citizens into supplicants. Our properties are converted into gifts from the great leader. Our rights are converted into permissions. Our country has become his country.

10. There has been, over the years since his passing, a quite deliberate erasure of our memory of Tunku. This should come as no surprise. He saw the wrong turn we were taking and he opposed it. He and several other leaders were excluded from UMNO Baru. He led a movement called Semangat 46. His conception of our politics and system of government had no place for corrupt practices, arbitrary executive power and the manipulation of racial and religious identity for political gain.

11. Tunku Abdul Rahman did not help us achieve independence and then the merger, alone. He led and worked with an entire class of individuals schooled in the culture and practice of parliamentary democracy. In politics and the civil service they thrived in a time before the machine politics of patronage and lowbrow identity politics had sucked the life and talent out of the ruling party and left it filled with people who quite simply don’t have the ability to hold this country together anymore.

12. The average age of our first cabinet was under thirty. Tun Razak was 28. Tun Dr Ismail was barely 30 years old. Men of their calibre would not have made it up the ladder of the party that has succeeded theirs. They would have been too untainted, too young to do so.

13. The IDEAS project looks back, then, not just to an individual but to an era in Malaysia’s brief history. It will promote the values and principles on which we were formed.

14. Over the course of that history we have not trodden a continuous path to the present day. There have been two regimes, or political dispensations, in the life of this country, young as she is.

15. The first began in the fifties and ended in 1970. The dispensation that followed came to a mortal crisis in 1997 and limped on to 2008. Against the background of those changes, what has followed the elections of March 2008 is hard to describe as anything but the detritus of a once functioning political system.

16. If any one of us was tempted to imagine that Malaysia had outgrown the sordid events of 1997, the government’s newspapers bring to our breakfast tables each day Sodomy 2, to remind us that after another decade of sloganeering, as Tunku Zain Al-Abidin pointed out, we have come full circle to find ourselves back at the doorstep of our debased institutions and a Constitution that is increasingly inoperative.

17. The progress of the trial of the leader of the Opposition, the government’s apparent ignorance of the sovereign rights of the states and the way in which we have allowed religious issues to be manipulated, point to that conclusion. The constitutional crisis in Perak, in which a government has been installed by illegal means, the failure to implement two royal commissions of inquiry findings, point to that conclusion.

18. The barbarous political culture promoted by the establishment media brings us full circle, and drives home the point: our system of government is still in 1997. We are still in the afterwash of a wave of bad taste, authoritarianism and arbitrary power that destroyed our practice of
parliamentary democracy, compromised our judiciary and police, and disenfranchised our people.

19. To modify Tunku’s words, we now have a democracy “existing in name, but grievously compromised in substance, reality and fact.”

20. Our penchant for slogans is a reflection of our dislocation from the living reality of constitutional and parliamentary democracy. We don’t need slogans. We need our Constitution back.

21. This, then, is the context in which IDEAS has adopted its noble purpose. The efforts of idealistic young people, attuned to the principles of parliamentary democracy and to our real history, and equipped with a plan to effect that purpose, are exactly what we need at this time. We need this and other such efforts from the young. They should not let their repugnance at the
ugliness of our political system turn them away from it. It is precisely because we have a broken political system that it is so ugly. It is precisely because our main political parties are bound to infantile ethnic politics that we are now stagnant and declining as a country. Instead, I hope they see the mindlessness and ugliness of our present politics as a call to service.

22. I urge young people to rise to the task of changing our political system. We have left it to “the deranged” for too long as Tunku Zain Al-‘Abidin calls them. To expect change from the incumbents is to expect, in the Malay saying, the mice to repair the gourd…“Bagai tikus baiki labu-labu.”

23. It is time for us to understand, discuss, organise and act together.

24. Tunku was a true Malaysian. As we have forgotten him, we have also forgotten how to be Malaysians. We must learn again how to be free and equal citizens of a constitutional democracy. In our national life we must learn again how to be a Federation of sovereign states governed by the rule of law.

25. Let us come together to recover whatever UMNO has robbed from us.

15/02/10

Will Najib now ask Umno executive secretary Abdul Rauf Yusoh to resign for doing a Nasir Safar at an Umno Club function in London?

The denial by Umno executive secretary Datuk Abdul Rauf Yusoh that he had made racist remarks at an Umno Club function in London a few days ago is most revealing for its self-incriminatory and confessional nature.

Rauf, who led an Umno delegation to London to meet with party members in a private closed-door meeting earlier this week was alleged to refer to non-Malays as “bangsa asing” who were trampling on the Malays in “Tanah Melayu”.

In a letter sent to The Malaysian Insider, Ahmad Naim Mazlan, a first-year finance and accounting student heard Rauf saying “Jangan biarkan bangsa asing pijak kepala kita.” (Don’t let the foreigners walk all over our heads.)

Ahmad Naim said in his letter:

“There was also a vigorous defence of Datuk Nasir Safar’s recent comments against non Malays which branded non Malays as beggars and prostitutes. According to one Umno Youth exco member present, those comments were not racist but quite contrarily, ‘just facts’….

“Throughout the session, non-Malays were treated as the enemy, and whilst they did praise Prime Minister Datuk Seri Najib Razak, there was no mention of 1 Malaysia, unity or multiracial nation-building. During some moments in the session, they sounded nothing less than Vikings on the path to war — an Umno Youth exco said something to the effect of Umno willing to fight to the death the threats made by non-Malays. These threats were, strangely enough, never detailed….

“Whatever one thinks of Umno’s sloganeering via 1 Malaysia, the fact is that if even these individuals cannot help but promote the diametric opposite to what 1Malaysia is supposed to entail, then what hope is there for Umno and BN?

“As much as what Najib says and does count above all else, it is most shameful that his generals are doing their best to derail the Malaysian dream. Najib’s decision to fire his aide only last week was commendable, but he was just an aide. Will he take similar measures against people with positions in the party who speak out against 1 Malaysia? I may be just a kid yet, but if Najib is to succeed as a reformist, then he must make sure the entire — or at least much of the party — follows suit.”

The question asked by the first-year finance and accounting student, who is son of a life-long Umno member, is most pertinent and valid.

Will Najib now ask Umno executive secretary Abdul Rauf Yusoh to resign for doing a Nasir Safar at an Umno Club function in London?

This question is all the more relevant as Abdul Rauf, in his denial of having made any derogatory remarks, has compounded his offence and insensitivity by virtually admitting what Ahmad Naim had written, except to give the excuse that he was speaking at “a closed-door meeting and no one outside should be listening in to what was being discussed”.

Najib should clarify whether he endorses Abdul Raul’s contention that it was all right for Umno leaders to share Nasir Safar’s racist views at the Malacca 1Malaysia seminar labelling Indians and Chinese in Malaysia as “pendatang” and that “Indians came to Malaysia as beggars and Chinese especially the women came to sell their bodies” so long as they are expressed in internal Umno forums and not publicly?

Would every Umno Minister and MP be required to publicly declare whether they agree with Nasir Safar or not?

How can Najib convince Malaysians that he is sincere and serious about his 1Malaysia slogan and concept to create national unity based on diversity and inclusiveness in a multi-racial, multi-religious and multi-cultural nation when this is openly opposed inside Umno?

Fifty-two years after Merdeka, has Umno itself become the greatest threat to Malaysian nation-building and Najib’s 1Malaysia’s concept?

The questioning by Ahmad Naim, though only first-year finance and accounting student, is proof that there is still hope for the vision of a united and inclusive Malaysian nation where every Malaysian regards himself or herself as Malaysian first, and by race, religion or region second – and that the future of Malaysia is really in the hands of the new young generation of Malaysians who want to move away from the politics of race hatred and religious intolerance rather than the present breed of Umno and Barisan Nasional politicians.

Lim Kit Siang
12/02/10

Racist Umno Youth propaganda in London

Hi, my name is Ahmad Naim, and I am a first year student in the UK. I write about my experience last weekend in London where I overhead a discussion by Umno Youth leaders.

A student in the UK is exposed to many experiences. The apolitical learn to be political, the apathetic become aware, the previously anti-social join student-run clubs and harness talents they never knew they had.

And beyond these positive developments, I learnt a few days ago that a first-year student such as myself can also find that the Malaysian Dream can be stomped upon even in a land that teaches us the values of democracy, freedom and equality.

I learnt of the impending arrival in London of a large delegation of Umno leaders from a few friends from Kelab Umno London. There was to be a private session between the delegation and Kelab Umno leaders/members. For the record, I had contemplated joining the club which swore to be run solely for the purposes of the welfare of Malay(sian) students in the British capital.

But ever the student I am, procrastination is my middle name. In any case, I was not overly keen to meet with the Umno delegation which included the Umno secretary Datuk Rauf (something) and around six or seven Umno Youth exco members (some look like post-graduate students, so I cannot tell the difference) and ladies.

However, because food was on my mind I decided to accompany my friends headed down to the Malaysian Students Department, or MSD (located next to Malaysia Hall) anyway.

Respecting the private nature of the discussion, I sat outside the modest room housed by the MSD gobbling away (self-paid) while the session was being held. Unknown to those inside the room, much said in there was audible to those sitting near the back partition. The window overlooking Queensborough Terrace where MSD is located also makes it quite easy to look into the hall.

Armed with a book, I tried reading while sipping a ‘teh tarik’ but I couldn’t seem to bring my mind to concentrate on reading. Disturbing words of racist politics could be heard coming through the cracks of the partition.

The only person to take the stage was the quite sizeable Umno secretary Rauf whilst the Umno Youth exco members also fielded questions from the floor. I wasn’t eavesdropping but the booming voices – especially those of Rauf and one Umno Youth member by the name of Megat – made it quite easy to make out the racist remarks which were spilling out of their primary orifice.

In his rant, Rauf called non-Malays ‘bangsa asing’ who were trampling on the Malays in ‘Tanah Melayu’. I remember a direct quote, ‘Jangan biarkan bangsa asing pijak kepala kita’ as though the non-Malays were interested in little else than seeing Malays fail for their sinister, selfish goals.

There was also a vigorous defense of Nasir Safar’s recent comments against non-Malays which branded non-Malays as beggars and prostitutes. According to one Umno Youth exco member present, those comments were not at all racist but quite contrarily ‘just facts’. My oh my, I saw a Chinese couple next to me trying to tune out the words and focus on their meals.

Throughout the session, non-Malays were treated as the enemy and whilst they did praise Prime Minister Najib Tun Razak, there was no mention of ‘1Malaysia’, unity or multiracial nation- building.



During some moments in the session, they sounded nothing less than Vikings on the path to war – an Umno Youth exco said something to the effect of Umno willing to fight to the death against threats made by non-Malays. These threats were, strangely enough, never detailed.

Regardless, what I found most disturbing was the fact that these individuals, by all accounts, are (I think) high-ranking Umno leaders. Rauf, for all intents and purposes, as I Googled, is the COO of Umno. Whatever one thinks of Umno’s sloganeering via ‘1Malaysia’, the fact is that if even these individuals cannot help but promote the diametric opposite to what ‘1Malaysia’ is supposed to entail, then what hope is there for Umno and BN?

As much as what Najib says and does counts above all else, it is most shameful that his generals are doing their best to derail the Malaysian Dream. Najib’s decision to fire his aide only last week was commendable but he was just an aide. Will he take similar measures against people with positions in the party who speak out against ‘1Malaysia’?

I may be just a kid yet, but if Najib is to succeed as a reformist, then he must make sure the entire – or at least much of the party – follows suit. Otherwise, even the son of a lifelong Umno member will think twice about voting BN. Sigh. Shaken I was despite not sitting in at the meeting. Umno propaganda is indeed powerful.

Mk
12/02/10

PKR leaders say good riddance to Zahrain

KUALA LUMPUR, Feb 12 — PKR’s top leadership said today it was no surprise that Datuk Seri Zahrain Hashim resigned from the party.

“Not surprised at all, we were expecting it.” said party secretary- general Saifuddin Nasution.

He said they knew it was only a matter of time before the Bayan Baru MP left, after he expressed his unhappiness with Penang Chief Minister Lim Guan Eng and the PKR leadership.

Zahrain had previously called Lim a “chauvinist, dictator and communist-minded” and told reporters today he is beginning to have doubts about Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim’s leadership.

Saifuddin said PKR would come out of this stronger and its leadership will not let the party be affected by this sort of politics.

“PKR members will work harder to prove that it’s a capable and stronger opposition.”

PKR strategic director Chua Tian Chang, better known as Tian Chua, pointed out that Zahrain was facing disciplinary action to explain why he should not be sacked.

“As far the party is concern, opportunists who don’t share our vision can go. It’s better for us that they leave now.”

He added that the party had gone through many ups and downs in its 10-year history and Zahrain’s departure was nothing new.

Chua, who is Batu MP, said PKR had many other capable and credible people ready to move up its ranks.

Zahrain’s departure comes amid rumours that several other PKR MPs would quit before the Chinese Lunar New Year on Sunday.

Chua said he did not want to elaborate but he did say that the party would not be held to ransom by anybody.

PKR deputy president Dr Syed Hussein said “good riddance, the party will become stronger without him” when asked to comment about Zahrain’s resignation.

“This shows he did not dare face the party’s disciplinary board,”

Syed added other opportunists in PKR who wanted to leave “can join Zahrain.”

Party vice-president R. Sivarasa asaid it was quite clear Zahrain left because he did not want to face the party’s disciplinary board.

“It also shows he did not have any basis for making his allegations.” said the Subang MP who added that voters will reject Zahrain in the next elections.

Malaysian Insider
12/02/10

Aussie lawmakers: Drop Anwar trial

SYDNEY: More than 50 Australian lawmakers have lodged a formal protest urging Malaysia to drop opposition leader Anwar Ibrahim’s sodomy trial and warning it will hurt the country’s image, an official said on Friday.

The group, which includes MPs and senators from both major parties, called for the case against Anwar to be abandoned in the interests of building “confidence in the impartial rule of law in Malaysia.”

“Many friendly observers of Malaysia find it difficult to believe that a leading opposition voice could be charged with sodomy a second time, and so soon after his party made major gains in national elections,” the protest letter says.

“It should be made known to the Malaysian government, that in our opinion, global esteem for Malaysia will be affected by these charges against Mr. Anwar.

“We hope that Malaysia’s authorities will not pursue these charges.”

Michael Danby, member of the governing centre-left Labor Party and chairman of Australia’s foreign affairs parliamentary subcommittee, said he handed the letter to Malaysian High Commissioner Salman bin Ahmad in Canberra on Thursday.

“A lot of people know Anwar Ibrahim, a lot of people have been to Malaysia, and a lot of Australian parliamentarians think it’s a shame that this is happening for the second time to the leader of the opposition in what is a developing democracy,” Danby told AFP.

“We (feel we) should stand up and support a fellow democrat.”

Former opposition leader Malcolm Turnbull and Bob Brown, leader of the Greens party were among the signatories, as well as independent Senator Nick Xenophon and two minor members of the Labor Party frontbench.

Danby said the Malaysian high commissioner was well aware that there was a “wide spectrum of opinion in Australia” and the letter was not intended to inflame diplomatic relations.

“We hope it shows people in Malaysia and the opposition that we care,” Danby said.

Anwar, who faces 20 years imprisonment if convicted of illicit sexual relations with a young former aide, has condemned the allegations against him as a political conspiracy to sideline the opposition.

He has accused High Court judge Mohamad Zabidin Diah of refusing to rein in “biased” media coverage of the much-delayed trial, which began last week.

Anwar was arrested in 1998 on sodomy and corruption charges but made a stunning comeback after being freed from prison in 2004. His sexual misconduct charge was overturned after he had spent six years behind bars.

AFP
12/02/10

Muhyiddin Yassin, Are you blind, deaf or dumb

SHAH ALAM: A PKR official yesterday derided the Deputy Prime Minister for what he described as the latter’s “ludicrous” rejection of a report by the Hong Kong based Perc that Malaysia was becoming increasingly unattractive to investors.

Lee Boon Chye (picture), a vice-president in Parti Keadilan Rakyat and the Member of Parliament for Gopeng, said the government could not be unaware that the report was based on truth.

He said even the less-educated members of the public could tell that things were out of joint in Malaysia.

In its latest report on Malaysia, Perc (Political and Economic Risk Consultancy) says that the country is heading towards instability in the political, economic and security spheres.

Lee, in an interview with TVSelangor.com, said few Malaysians would disagree with that assessment.

“Even those in the lower rungs of society know we have major problems: the integrity of the judiciary, the ‘Allah’ controversy, the theft of jet engines and so on.”

He said it was a shame that deputy premier Muhyiddin Yassin and “all other Umno leaders” were in denial and thus could not be expected to do anything to make things better.

“This is not going to help restore investor confidence,” he said. “The big problem is that they won’t admit there’s a problem.”

FMT
12/02/10

The best way for the Pakatan Rakyat to win back its lost Indian electoral ground is to team up with the Human Rights Party (HRP)

Universiti Sains Malaysia (USM)deputy dean from USM's school of social sciences Sivamurugan Pandian said such a combination looked the best bet for Pakatan to reach out to Indian voters across the country, despite Hindraf's self-destructive tendencies.

Given that virtually all Indian-based parties and organisations were linked to Barisan Nasional, he said it was politically crucial for Pakatan to include an Indian face to its fold.

He said Pakatan now had a Muslim face in PAS, Chinese face in DAP and a Malay-led multi racial face in PKR.

"Teaming up with HRP - Hindraf would secure Pakatan the majority Indian votes required to reach Putrajaya in the 13th general election.

"Otherwise Pakatan would not be able to muster the Indian votes," the academician predicted, although Hindraf has been at Pakatan's and the Barisan Nasional's throats whenever an opportunity presented itself.

Sleeping with devil for mutual benefit

Still, Sivamurugan (right) raised the question of whether HRP - Hindraf was willing to team up with Pakatan.

"Currently HRP - Hindraf attacks both the BN and the Pakatan.

"However, both should be able to work out a deal for mutual benefit if they want to," he said.

He told Malaysiakini said it would not be difficult for PKR supremo Anwar Ibrahim to forge ties with that group since both had pulled together so well in last general elections.

That move could also fill a gap in the Pakatan -- the lack of leaders charismatic enough to appeal to the Indian masses, pointing out that the present lot have failed miserably to fire the imagination of the community.

He said none of them have emerged thus far, despite being elected representatives for the past 20 months, to stand out as a grassroots leader.

"Indians are dismayed that they didn't get a strong political representation in Pakatan,' said Sivamurugan.

On contrary, he said HRP - Hindraf leaders, especially P Uthayakumar and his London-based brother Waytha Moorthy, have consistently fought for working class Indians over various issues, without elaborating.

Sivamurugan said despite attempts by certain former Hindraf activists to destabilise the movement the HRP - Hindraf leaders have fought consistently for the Indian community.

MK
12/02/10

Hindraf supports Zaid's call for reforms

Hindraf Makkal Sakthi chair P Waythamoorthy has expressed cautious optimism over Pakatan Rakyat (PR) chair Zaid Ibrahim's call for change and reform in Malaysia.

Makkal Sakthi – people power in Tamil – is the Hindu Rights Action Front (Hindraf) theme.

Waythamoorthy (left) foresees that Sabah and Sarawak will be taking an increasingly neutral stance to determine who rules in Putrajaya.

“The March 2008 political tsunami in Peninsular Malaysia has given a chance for them do what is best for themselves,” said Waythamoorthy.

He was speaking to Malaysiakini in Kota Kinabalu from London.

Hopelessly divided

The Hindraf stalwart sees both sides of the political divide in Peninsular Malaysia as hopelessly divided in the foreseeable future. Still, in Umno for example, there are leaders like Tengku Razaleigh who can be expected to reach out across the political divide.

“Peninsular Malaysia is emerging as volatile and unpredictable despite the best efforts of Umno to force the Malays to circle the wagons,” said Waythamoorthy.

Under these circumstances, Sabah and Sarawak have the opportunity to be a third force in Malaysian politics, he added. “This is more than a catchphrase. This signals a maturing of politics in Malaysia.

“There is strong political leadership in Sabah and much promise in Sarawak. Hindraf has much support in these two states and we have much to learn from them. We don't mind campaigning in Sabah and Sarawak to push the agenda for change and reform. We have raised this with Dr Jeffrey Kitingan (right).”

Waythamoorthy sees the politics of both states as rising above petty rivalries and race or religion. He believes that the people have the right to hear the truth and decide the kind of political parties they want in government and the opposition. For him, the choice appears to be between keeping feudal-style Malay political warlords or embracing egalitarianism in the running of the nation's politics.

No amount of temple demolishing, church bombings or hurling wild-boar heads into mosque compounds is going to derail the people's political process in Malaysia, swore Waythamoorthy. “The people's message from the streets to the lunatic fringe is to cease and desist.”

Critical views

Former Sabah PKR State Secretary Kanul Gindol takes a more critical view of the PKR, however. He thinks it is bogged down by Anwar Ibrahim's 'politics is my family's business' approach in running the party.

Then, he reckoned that there is the Umno-style “corrupt to the core political vagabonds who have jumped on the PKR's bandwagon. There's also the “proxies, stooges and traitors” cultivated in Sabah and Sarawak to serve their political masters in Peninsular Malaysia,” continued Kanul.

Former Sabah PKR deputy chief Daniel John Jambun sees Zaid's speech as the proverbial light at the end of the tunnel. “It offers hope to Sabah and Sarawak,” said Daniel, also the deputy chair of the powerful Sabah PKR KadazanDusunMurut Task Force.

However some former senior Sabah BN activists in Sabah and Sarawak are not that sure and expect four crucial events in the near future to stress PKR to the breaking point.

The first is Anwar Ibrahim's Sodomy 2 trial. Then there is the suspected willingness among a number of PKR MPs to be bought over by Umno to give it a two-thirds majority in Parliament to pass the new electoral rolls.

Thirdly, the Federal Court is expected to rule on the continuing saga of the two Menteris Besar in Perak on Feb 9 and the decision could have a huge impact on PKR's future.

Finally, it is believed, that Umno 'moles' in PKR are ready to seize control of the party 'when Anwar is carted off to jail'.

The last group, said to be closely linked to Anwar himself, is said to have already written his political obituary and successfully lobbied for party elections, due next month, but expected to be deferred to May.

East Malaysia will be watching these developments very closely.

“Those who think that they can seize control of the party and get away with it are sadly mistaken., said a senior Sabah PKR activist. “Sabah and Sarawak won't just go along with anyone in Peninsular Malaysia who comes to power through undemocratic means.”

Mk
12/02/10

Malaysian Indian and modern day slavery at the hands of UMNO.

The latest custodial death toll of the Malaysian Indian just moved a notch up with the death of P. Babu in Jempol. The endless death in police custody of the Malaysian Indian has no boundary for the unfounded power that the PDRM wield under the UMNO led government.

Imagine? P.Babu, a young orphan, attended willfully for an enquiry and he ends up beinf murdered in police custody.

All the talk of One Malaysian and the stage drama conducted by Najib in visiting Chennai and Thaipusam is nothing but a charade for the voters’ bank. Similarily those who dance to his tunes including those Malaysian Indians who are totally nonchalant in ending the policy driven slavery of the Malaysian Indians at the hand of UMNO is similar to what the segregated African had to go through the Apartheid system from 1948 to 1994.

The poverty stricken Malaysian Indians are in similar position today in an indirect slavery, through the policies and underhand powers that UMNO supports in maintaining the slavery of the Malaysian Indians in police custody as well as the socio development of this segment through their mandores.

The significance of poverty stricken Malaysian Indian is always played down for the stigma that is created whether it is from UMNO or the opposition as they are only visible when the vote bank counts. It is a foregone conclusion that Pakatan is not the kind of force that can challenge UMNO hegemony when the MB of Selangor was conveniently sidelined in Batu Caves and all that they could do is brood in media and play politics rather than to take measures to prevent such events that they should have foreseen.

The problem here lies not with UMNO, but the inefficient and ineffective PAKATAN, UMNO has its own problem driven by greed and power and therefore weak in her stand. However the PAKATAN coalition seems to be equal partners as they fail to reach out to the poverty stricken Malaysian Indians to address their problems but rather diddle around without a direction in their political ploys.

The death in custody of a Malaysian Indian is a national issue irrespective of origin, but nobody seems to focus on it except that what we normaly see, a statement or two by the leaders then everything dies off as another political playground reigns. Only if the Pakatan can stay chained and focused, will they have the chance to make the difference for the majority of poverty stricken Malaysian Indians and in whole for the masses.

The death of P.Babu will soon become another brutal episode for UMNO to celebrate its slavery of the Malaysian Indians and PAKATAN to play politics similar to what happened to Francis Udayappan, Kugan, Teoh Beng Hock, and Gunasegaran.

The Premier of Malaysia, Najib should be ashamed of himself, as he goes wooing the Malaysian Indians yet in his backyard, his dogs ie the PDRM continues its unbridled slavery through their policies against the poverty stricken Malaysian Indians with the murder of P. Babu in police custody.

P. Waytha Moorthy
Hindraf
Chairman
12/02/10

Need Malaysian Indian votes, SOS the real HINDRAF

After the March 8, 2008 battle, everyone settled in but then everything got political minus the root issues that faced the community. We had the dream of September 16, 2008 where Anwar failed miserably, then the hopping frogs in DAP and PKR that handed UMNO Perak, the issue of Kg Buah Pala, the courting of turncoats in HINDRAF and then neverending disputes in Pakatan Rakyat.

Now, of course, we don’t even know how the turn is going to be as Pakatan attempts to hold fort its coalition through their mandores but Najib woos the Malaysian Indians directly as he understands that MIC or the other parties can no longer act as the mandores for the Malaysian Indian community.

In a sense, Najib is actually wiser than those in Pakatan in understanding the need of the Indian society although he is just another UMNO elite who cares only for himself and his political survival.

But why has Najib has not approached the real HINDRAF leaders? Maybe he has, but is unable to fulfill the needs of the real demands that addresses the truth and reality that faces this community but rather play politics to hoodwink like what he did by visiting Tamil Nadu & during Thaipusam. Boy!!! Oh Boy!!! He must take the Malaysian Indians to be such suckers that this would appease their frustration towards the uneven policies in Malaysia.

Then you have the Pakatan donkeys, playing a similar role but not wanting to deal with real issues that actually matter but rather play politics as what UMNO has been doing with their subservient allies including the Malays, Indians, Chinese and lain-lain, only to benefit themselves.

I do agree changes at least in the four (4) states that they control will not happen overnight. But how does it help if they keep playing politics rather than addressing the needs of the under-privileged society due to oppressive policies? If they are worried about the votes, then there is something wrong with their perception of a Malaysian. Being a Malaysian is Ketuanan Malaysia irrespective of race, religion or creed. Malaysia belongs to all Malaysians so it should be fair and just for the under-classed and under-privileged too. If that is not the case, then how did NEP survive since 1970’s where 50% of the civil servants that administrated this well meant system then was the non-Malays for the Malays. Rather than engaging with the right partners, Pakatan seems to love to be in the offensive mode if anything is questioned. So how different is this from what UMNO has been doing?

I speak as a Malaysian solely only interested in enhancing the cry of fellow brethrens irrespective of their origins who are caught up in an oppressive system that discriminates based on ethnicity and the political drama that both UMNO and Pakatan play without understanding the sentiments of being a Malaysian. They would rather divide us into lines to create their desired effect.

For all that the genuine HINDRAF cries, it should not be something that plays its part to fit an agenda in our own perverted mind for political allegiance, but it should deal with real isues that plague our society for the betterment of the nation.

HINDRAF in its part, being a pressure group, has criticized both UMNO and PAKATAN. Yet none would engage the real leaders to create a Ketuanan Malaysia that is translucent but rather play the race agenda for their continued existence. Saying this, I reflect back on the modus operandi of the nation and its people. Politically and in policy the Malays are protected, economically the Chinese are protected whereas the Malaysian Indians and the lain-lain including Sabah & Sarawak are forever at the mercy of another although they are able to contribute in equal terms if given the opportunity.

So, Dear Pakatan and those NGOs who are serious to create a Ketuanan Malaysia, please engage the real HINDRAF rather than be a chameleon for political survival.

Mk
12/02/10

Zahrain is a liability and no loss to Pakatan, another bastard Zulkifki Nordin is matter of time

Datuk Seri Zahrain Mohd Hashim confirmed today what has been swirling in political circles for weeks. He quit PKR and will represent the good people of Bayan Baru as an Independent in Parliament.

It is likely others from PKR might keep him company at the bench for Independents where Pasir Mas MP Datuk Ibrahim Ali currently sits with the two SAPP MPs.

These few, like Zahrain, have been critical of PKR leaders and partners in the Pakatan Rakyat of late, just as they near two years ruling Kedah, Penang and Selangor since Election 2008.

Yet, they have never articulated their grouses save for calling Penang Chief Minister Lim Guan Eng dictatorial or authoritarian or someone who prefers his own DAP men over his allies. And of course, there is always the matter of money or allocations. And posts.

Their behaviour and demands speak for themselves. Perhaps it comes from years of being part of the ruling coalition Barisan Nasional. Perhaps it’s because of their closeness to de facto leader Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim. Perhaps it’s because they are just born that way where everyone else has to give way to them.

Be it in corporate or political organisations, no one is indispensable especially politicians who still put self before the larger interest of the party or the nation. These are politicians without principles, who latch on to causes for their on greater self-interest and then whinge when they don’t get their way.

In Zahrain’s case, it has been festering since he was passed over for a senior post in the Penang state government or Lim over-ruling him in giving out a contract for the Bukit Jambul Golf and Country Club. For this, he has argued the case against Lim and complained that Anwar is soft on his allies and hard against his own party members.

But Anwar has not been seen to be strict with his own members, if the experience of Kulim Bandar Baharu MP Zulkifli Noordin comes to mind. The Syariah lawyer has been attacking PKR allies PAS and DAP despite a gag order and being hauled up before the party disciplinary panel last month.

Zahrain too was due to face the panel but his resignation today will end that saga.

Fact is, PKR should count itself fortunate that Zahrain decided to take the plunge and leave the party as it has never had the stomach to tick off or kick out members. It has always been a case of a disgruntled few leaving and denouncing the leadership since its early days as Parti KeAdilan Nasional in 1999.

For PKR, Zahrain’s resignation is an opportunity to spring-clean the party and get rid of the selfish who are just there because they are loyal to Anwar. PKR needs men and women of principle and those who won’t wilt or cry because they don’t get attention or money.

Election 2008 has shown that the voters have a choice in choosing the party and the candidate. The people in Kelana Jaya put their trust in ‘Lingam’ cameraman Loh Gwo-Burne despite a lack of fluency in Bahasa Malaysia or any other redeeming qualities over the MCA/Barisan Nasional candidate because they were fed up with the ruling coalition and gave a chance to PKR. The same with Bayan Baru in Election 2008.

The situation will be different in the next general elections. Pakatan Rakyat will have to pull up its socks and get better candidates if it wants to retain its seats and grab more in its quest to capture Putrajya. Five assemblymen have already left the opposition pact to be friendly with Barisan Nasional. Zahrain has also left.

The quality leaves a lot to be desired. Its time PKR realise that and do the necessary. Kick them out before they become toxic. Don’t create another Zahrain saga and leave it lingering to poison its new dawn.

MI
12/02/10

Umno official making racist remarks in London

KUALA LUMPUR: Umno executive secretary, Datuk Abdul Rauf Yusoh, has vehemently denied a Malaysian student’s allegation that he made racist remarks at an Umno Club function in London a few days ago.

Rauf led an Umno delegation to London to meet with party members there in a private closed-door meeting earlier this week. There the student, Ahmad Naim Mazlan, heard the party official refer to non-Malays as “bangsa asing” who were trampling on the Malays in “Tanah Melayu”.

In a letter sent to The Malaysian Insider, the finance and accounting student heard Rauf saying “Jangan biarkan bangsa asing pijak kepala kita.” (Don’t let the foreigners walk all over our heads.)

But Rauf denied making any derogatory remarks, stressing that the session was a closed-door meeting and no one outside should be listening in to what was being discussed.

“This was a closed door session... this is not true, because what I said was that Malays must sustain power in order to gain respect from the Chinese and other races,” Rauf told The Malaysian Insider in a telephone interview.

The top Umno official went to great lengths to point out that the function was a party function for “Kelab Umno” and was not a public forum organised by the Malaysian Students Department.

“I think the student who overheard, his BM (Malay language) was not very good,” he added.

The student in London also claimed to have overheard Rauf and an “Umno Youth Exco” defending Datuk Nasir Safar’s recent racist tirade against non-Malays.

Nasir resigned as special officer to the Prime Minister shortly after controversy erupted over an allegedly racist statement he made at a 1 Malaysia seminar in Malacca. It was alleged that he said, “Indians came to Malaysia as beggars and Chinese especially the women came to sell their bodies”

“I am not supporting Nasir Safar at all! I am not supporting what he said. Let me just put it this way — there is a right forum to talk about Malay interests, and what Nasir Safar did was not right, talking like that in public.

“If it was discussed behind a closed door session, its normal, but he said it outside... what he said was not right,” said Rauf, who used to be the Umno Youth assistant secretary.

He also maintained that Umno is essentially a Malay party, therefore it was an acceptable practice for Umno to talk about “Malay interests”.
12/02/10

Malay Rulers’ declaration to to forbid non-Muslims from using the word ‘Allah’. neglecting the rights and religious freedom of other races.

If the Barisan Nasional (BN) federal government ever wonders why non-Muslim support is evaporating, they should look no further than the Malay Rulers’ declaration to protect the sanctity and status of Islam without neglecting the rights and religious freedom of other races.

That declaration was made at the 220th Conference of Rulers yesterday and is in line with Umno’s stand that had led the government to forbid non-Muslims from using the word ‘Allah’.

By default or design, the establishment is forcing non-Muslims to get protection and support from the Pakatan Rakyat (PR) coalition, who appear to have taken an enlightened view of the matter.

In fact, it would now take a blinkered non-Muslim to throw his lot behind Umno/BN and the monarchy, which proclaimed the translation of ‘God’ to ‘Allah’ had caused much confusion and dissatisfaction among the people of Malaysia, particularly Muslims.

“This issue, unless resolved immediately, will undermine the sanctity of Islam and, possibly, security and public order as well,” the office of the Keeper of the Rulers’ Seal said.

The statement pointed out that Article 3 of the Federal Constitution provided for Islam to be the country’s official religion and the Malay Rulers to be the heads of religion in the states of the country.

“The Malay Rulers have the responsibility to safeguard the sovereignty and sanctity of Islam as the official religion of the country without neglecting the rights and religious freedom of the other races.

“The Malay Rulers give the undertaking to fulfill their responsibility to protect the sanctity and status of Islam,” it said.

The statement said the Malay Rulers took note that the issue over the use of the word “Allah” by the Catholic weekly magazine, Herald, was under consideration by the Court of Appeal.

And in a democracy where there is a separation of powers with the Rulers being the fountain of justice, it is best left to the judiciary to decide on the constitutional rights of all Malaysians.

As it is, some Malaysians are labelled as ‘kaum asing’ or ‘kaum pendatang’ even as Prime Minister Datuk Seri Najib Razak valiantly tries to promote his 1 Malaysia concept.

None of these remarks can help draw back support to the BN, where some component parties are plagued by in-fighting that they have lost focus in regaining votes from their respective communities.

As days go by, BN is losing the trust and support of Malaysians of all walks of life that have kept it in power from Merdeka when it was the Alliance. PR is winning over that trust, enough to propel it to control four states and more than a third of the 222-seat parliament.

Just as Malaysians are now searching their souls for reasons to stay and support the government of the day, BN too will have to do some soul-searching about whether it represents all Malaysians because paying lip-service to Najib’s 1 Malaysia will lead to its downfall.

And while the Malay Rulers are only fulfilling their constitutional roles in speaking for Islam, Malaysians are looking to them for wisdom to handle a situation that is causing fissures in an otherwise harmonious country.

After all, they are constitutional monarchs for all Malaysians, not just for one community.

MI
13/02/10

Chinese and Indian Malaysians Feel Racial Discrimination

Young Chinese and Indian Malaysians say they feel discriminated against, racially, in their country. This is the conclusion of a recent survey conducted.

Malaysia is a multi-ethnic nation that got its independence from Britain in 1957. Indigenous ethnic Malays and other Malayan peoples (bumiputera or "sons of the soil") comprise 60 percent of the country’s population. Ethnic Chinese account for 26 percent of the population, while ethnic Indians make up about 7 percent. The remaining 5 percent is made up of Small numbers of Indonesians, Thai, Europeans, and Australians.

It found that 75 per cent of Malays feel they have never been treated unfairly due to their race.

The Chinese, who dominate Malaysia's economy, feel most dissatisfied and unfairly treated. They feel that they have significantly less ownership of the country compared to other races. The Chinese gave 'significantly negative responses' to economic policy issues. They complain that government policies favours UMNO putras.

Almost all ethnic Malays and over 50 percent of Malaysia are Muslims. Most Chinese are Buddhists, while most Indians practice Hinduism. Christianity dominates among the indigenous peoples of Sabah and Sarawak.

Even though there are constitutional guarantees of freedom of religion, religious and racial tensions persist. The other religions raise alarm over what they see as 'Islamisation' of the country.

It is also concluded that the racial and religious tensions are polarising the nation's youths along racial lines. Young Malaysians of today prefer "to mix within groups of their own race, due to lack of interaction between the races in schools and universities."

The long-standing dissatisfaction and anger felt by Chinese and Indians is responsible for the ruling coalition government's poor showing in the March 8, 2008 elections. Voters threw their support more to the opposition this time, thus depriving the Muslim Malay-majority government of a two-thirds majority in parliament and gave control of five states to the opposition.

Britain gained gradual control of Peninsular Malaysia between the late 18th and early 19th centuries. At the same time the British imported ethnic Chinese and Indians laborers to work in Malaysia’s tin and rubber industries. Those early migrant workers are the basis of the current Chinese and Indian population of Malaysia. Ethnic tensions, especially between Chinese and Malays, are nothing new in Malaysian politics and economy.

12/02/10

Umno BN treats Indians as ‘beggars’

Human Rights Party Malaysia (HRP) is alleging that Umno BN is treating the Indian community as` beggars’ by dishing out `crumbs’ and `peanuts’ instead of giving them their equal rights in the share of the economic cake of the country.

HRPM pro-tem secretary-general P Uthayakumar claimed that the Indians have been systematically and deliberately excluded and segregated from about 99% of the national mainstream development plans, policies and programmes directly benefiting the people.

“The Indians instead are merely given the ‘crumbs’ and ‘peanuts’ for show or puppet shadow play (wayang kulit) largely through the agency of a `mandore’ (supervisor) Indian political party,” Uthayakumar said.

He claimed that 70% of the Indians in Malaysia are suffering from poverty, being pushed towards or remaining poor, retained as low wage earners, and are underprivileged - all because of Umno’s racism, religious extremism, inequality, unequal opportunities, discrimination, segregation and merge upward mobility opportunities.

Such Umno policy goes against Article 8 of the Malaysian Federal Constitution, which enshrines, entrenches and guarantees equality before the law and non discrimination.

The former Hindraf ISA detainee also claimed that there are about 150,000 stateless Malaysian Indians in the country.

The suicide rate in Malaysia is highest among Indians largely because of socio-economic imbalance and poverty related problems, which are about 600% higher than in the Malay community.

He said “70% out of the 523 Tamil schools in the country have been denied the right to be made fully government funded government schools to be on par with Malay and Chinese schools.”

“This pathetic social-economic imbalance situation of the Indian community is continuing for the past 52 years because the Indians do not have the political or economic clout and they do not get to score very much political points or do not play to the gallery,” Uthayakumar reasoned.

Uthayakumar also stated that HRPM will never become a mandore party of either Umno BN or Pakatan, but will continue to fight for the equal rights of the Indian community.

MK
12/02/10

Rulers involving themselves in politics is very dangerous to Malaysia

I had been and still am concerned with 'royal political activism'. When I talk about 'royal political activism' I am not talking about politicians like Tengku Razaleigh Hamzah or the late Tunku Abdul Rahman.

I mean the sultans or regents or crown princes who have immunity from most of the laws applicable to commoners and who by virtue of such immunity should not come down to the commoners' political arena.

The royalty should stay above politics and not overstretch the limits of their constitutional rights as if they have free rein to engage directly in politics. If they do, then they must accept criticisms like politicians do, and not cry (or have their supporters cry) lèse majeste.

What the writers of the above report said is absolutely right, in that. 'Some people, perhaps simply because they like seeing Pak Lah squirm under the royal thumb in Perlis and Terengganu – cheered on the royalty, saying that their intervention was a good thing'.

'But it all depends on whose ox is being gored, doesn't it? Would these very same people cheer on the sultan's actions if this had happened to the opposition?'

So what did we have after the March 2008 elections? Perak! And did the Pakatan Rakyat supporters cheer on His Royal Highness as they did the rulers of Perlis and Terengganu?

On Tuesday, we heard the Federal Court rule on the Perak constitutional imbroglio that the sultan of Perak had the constitutional right to sack then menteri besar Mohd Nizar Jamaluddin. Incidentally Nizar, on learning of the astonishing court ruling, was wont to declare that we may henceforth expect rule by absolute monarchy.

I opine there have been two monumental blunders in Malaysian political strategy.

The first was when Dr Mahathir Mohamad, then as prime minister, wanted to outflank PAS' growing influence among the pious in the Malay heartland. He did so by declaring Malaysia as an Islamic nation, diametrically opposite to Tunku Abdul Rahman's earlier declaration that Malaysia was a secular state which upheld Islam as the nation's official religion.

By taking such a constitutionally radical step to neutralise PAS, he opened, what non-Muslims would call, a Pandora's Box, one which he couldn't close back again. From thence, he gradually gave in to the genie he unwittingly released.

The second major blunder happened on Tuesday, Feb 9, 2010. The Federal Court's ruling on the MB versus MB case has opened Pandora's box a second time, with a ruler now able to dismiss an elected MB of a state (and presumably, in the federal arena, the elected PM of our nation).

We are on very dangerous constitutional grounds. Prior to the March 2008 election, the idea of royalty as our political 'silver bullet' was promoted but I was one of those few who warned against jacking royalty up above its constitutional role. Of course, today, Raja Petra Kamarudin sings a different tune.

I have warned several times against recruiting the rulers in our struggle against the non- accountable and non-transparent Barisan Nasional. That would have been a move I likened as leaping from the frying pan into the fire.

I had also stated that some of those rulers had been and would be the problem rather the solution to sorting out the Barison Nasional which was after all an elected government but one which failed repetitively to practice good governance, transparency and accountability.

The problem confronting us was just that, - 'an elected government but one which failed repetitively to practice good governance, transparency and accountability' and even indulged in the occasional gerrymandering and questionable creativity in elections, but it wasn't a constitutional problem.

On the other hand, enlisting or encouraging the rulers to participate in our struggle for democratic reforms would in fact give rise to precisely that, a constitutional crisis. And haven't we got Perak? Padan muka?

MK
12/02/10

Malaysia State Constitutional Crisis

Malaysian court awards Perak to UMNO

Any indication that Malaysia's courts were becoming independent of the government disappeared from view again Tuesday when the five-member Federal Court ruled that United Malays National Organization stalwart Zambry Abdul Kadir is the rightful chief minister of the state of Perak, the country's second biggest and one of its richest.

The state has been caught a constitutional crisis since May of 2009, with the government paralyzed by the controversy over who was actually in charge. Perak had been controlled by the national opposition coalition Pakatan Rakyat as a result of the March 2008 national election, with Mohammad Nizar Jamaluddin as chief minister. However, then-Deputy Prime Minister Najib Tun Razak engineered the defection of three lawmakers, bringing the government to a halt in a 28-28 tie. Upon their defection, Sultan Raja Azlan Shah immediately ordered Nizar to vacate his position and installed Zambry in his place.

That kicked off a melee in which 65 people were arrested. Ahead of Tuesday's decision, Rais yatim, the the Information Communication and Culture Minister Datuk Seri Dr Rais Yatim, was quoted by the state-owned national wire service Bernama as calling on the people to be calm.

"We should respect the decision irrespective of whether it favors A or B. We are confident in our judicial system and in the way the law is administered," Bernama quoted him as saying.

"The mood is somber," said a Malay woman in Ipoh, the state capital. "I think people are going to just have to wait for the general election," which is probably three years away. "The feeling is that the verdict about Nizar and Zambry was decided a long time ago."
Kuala Lumpur High Court Judge Abdul Aziz Rahim ruled on May 11 that the sultan lacked the authority to remove Nizar without a vote of confidence in the statehouse, only to have the appellate court put his decision in abeyance a few hours later. The case – and the Perak state government – have been stalled as the Federal Court, the country's highest, took up the decision in November and has chewed on it ever since.

The ruling, led by Court of Appeal president Alauddin Mohd Sheriff, was built on the premise that the Barisan Nasional, or ruling national coalition, controls 31 votes in the Perak statehouse although no vote has ever been taken, and while the three defectors are said to be leaning towards the Barisan, they have given no official indication that they would cross the aisle. The Election Commission refused a letter proclaiming the realignment of their loyalty, setting the stage for the constitutional crisis.

When Nizar refused to go, instead of waiting for Judge Abdul Aziz's original ruling, elite federal Field Reserve Unit police invaded the statehouse on May 7 to drag opposition Speaker V. Sivakumar out of the chambers amid flying furniture and protests that resulted in the arrest of 65 people. As far as can be determined, it is the first time in Malaysian history that federal police had ever entered a legislature.

The ruling appears unlikely to end the continuing political uncertainty in either Perak or the government. Political analysts in Kuala Lumpur say the logical solution to the stalemate – a state popular by-election to determine the makeup of the statehouse – is unlikely because Najib and the Barisan do not believe they could win it.

The state, long a tin mining center, has an extremely large Chinese and Indian population and the Chinese have largely abandoned the Barisan because of the collapse into scandal of the Malaysian Chinese Association, which is embroiled in infighting over the disappearance of billions of dollars in the attempt to turn Port Klang, 60 km. west of Kuala Lumpur, into a multimodal port.

The Barisan instead appears to be counting on time to bring the voters, particularly disaffected ethnic Malays who have abandoned UMNO for the fundamentalist Parti Islam se-Malaysia and Anwar Ibrahim's Parti Keadilan Rakyat, or People's Justice Party, because of a long series of scandals and outright crimes.

However, Anwar is on trial in Kuala Lumpur in what has been widely billed as Sodomy 2, on charges of sodomizing a former aide in a trial that to everybody but the government itself appears to be built on dubious allegations that were laid to derail the first realistic challenge to the ruling national coalition since the country was formed.

In the meantime, his party is beset by infighting in several state assemblies, particularly Penang and Selangor, with a growing number of restive lawmakers threatening to leave the opposition coalition and return to the Barisan. Three have been brought before a disciplinary committee of the opposition coalition seeking answers to questions over their use of personal expense accounts.

The coalition that Anwar cobbled together has been an unlikely one from the start, with the Islamic, largely rural and fundamentalist PAS on one side and the ethnic Chinese Democratic Action Party on the other, with Anwar's moderate, urban Malays in the middle. Zulkifli Nordin, a member of Anwar's Parti Keadilan Rakyat, was quoted publicly earlier this week as predicting mass resignations over the next two to three weeks over tensions with the DAP and PKR's difficulty in dealing with them.

"The problem was that Anwar rounded up a bunch of incompetents to run in 2008, and disillusionment was so great with UMNO that a lot of people got voted into office who should never have been voted into office," said a businessman in Kuala Lumpur. The opposition coalition, he said, has thus never been able to capitalize on its gains by actually paying attention to governing. At the same time, the opposition has been harried by Najib's use of law enforcement powers including the Malaysian Anti-Corruption Commission and others to bring opposition lawmakers in on charges that many observers believe are superfluous.

Nonetheless, the court's decision appears certain to reinforce popular opinion that Malaysia's judiciary is thoroughly in the pockets of UMNO. That isn't helped by the case against Anwar, who is charged with having consensual sex with the former aide, a charge that is extremely rare in Malaysia and especially Kuala Lumpur, where gay bars abound and homosexuality isn't particularly condemned despite the fact that it is nominally against the law. An examination of the evidence against him in similar charges in 1998 leads to the overwhelming conclusion that it was concocted to derail his political career.

The case has been put on temporary hold as Anwar's lead counsel, Karpal Singh, seeks to disqualify the presiding judge, Mohd Zabidin Mohd Diah.

AS
12/02/10

The Anwar Ibrahim Trial: A Discredited Government’s Attempts to Persecute Opponent with Archaic Sodomy Laws

While the trial of Anwar Ibrahim on the charge of sodomy has drawn international concerns about whether he will be given a fair trial, the government-controlled media has today begun their “trial by media” in the same way they did over Sodomy trial #1. They have given headline prominence to the accuser’s allegations in an attempt to besmirch Anwar’s reputation and integrity.

In a repeat of the trial of Anwar 12 years ago on charges of corruption and sodomy, the latest trial bears the characteristic political persecution of the leader of the Opposition who has since the general elections of 2008, posed the biggest challenge to the ruling regime since Independence.

The way the trial has progressed clearly shows that Anwar has been denied a fair trial. Even before the trial began, the prosecution has refused to deliver evidence to the defence which is fundamental to ensuring a fair trial. Consequently, SUARAM does not believe that the current trial of Anwar will be in any manner fair and just.

The focus of the government-controlled media in playing up the testimony of Mohd Saiful at the High Court yesterday is clearly an attempt to discredit and cast doubts in the minds of the public over the morals of the former deputy prime minister.

While issues surrounding the question of a fair trial have drawn national and international concerns, another serious human rights violation surrounding the criminal charge on Anwar is the use of the archaic sodomy law of the country against him. All over the world, including countries in Asia, antiquated laws on sodomy are being abolished. On 2 July 2009, the Delhi High Court delivered a historic judgement to amend a 149-year-old colonial-era law and forthwith decriminalised private consensual sex between adults of the same sex. India became the 127th country to decriminalise homosexuality.

It is a shame that a country like Malaysia, which has in the past chaired the UN Commission on Human Rights and has been a recent member of the UN Human Rights Council, not only continues to maintain such archaic laws criminalising homosexuality but also uses it in a politically-motivated trial to discredit and neutralise a political challenger. The Barisan Nasional government’s continued pursuance of the political trial of Anwar Ibrahim and the farcical manner in which the trial progresses will doubtless discredit Malaysia in the eyes of the international community.

SUARAM strongly urges the government to drop its charges on Anwar and further calls for the abolition of our outdated sodomy laws. SUARAM further calls on the Malaysian media to be responsible in reporting the trial and not make this a parallel “trial by media”.

suaram
12/02/10

History has shown UMNO as thugs and do not know what is democracy

When they lost the election in 1969, the father of the to be prime minister organised riots for the Malays to attack innocent Chinese and that gave him an excuse to declare an emergency. Thereafter, he redrew the election boundaries to ensure a win each time.

Now that the Malays from the Parti Keadilan Rakyat, broke their stronghold on power, this time, in collusion with the Sultan, they are using thug tactics again. It sadden me to the core to read that the sultan appointed Menteri Besar (chief minister) is saying that the meeting convened for the State Assembly is a threat to national security. Where is all the logic gone. I guess it is a gangster logic. The sultan appointed a menteri besar without convening a state assembly to decide on a no confidence motion. If anything, it is Mr. Zambry and the BN and the sultan who is a threat to national security.

And there is the independence or lack of the civil service, the police and most specifically. the State Assembly secretary. I cannot imagine anywhere in the world the secretary of the assembly or parliament could judge the actions of the speaker of the assemby to be unconstitutional. These people are working for the BN and UMNO.

So what has happened to Mr. Karpal Singh is a small thing. UMNO can do bigger things, I mean the bad ones. UMNO owns all the newspapers in country, hiding behind structure.

12/02/10

Malaysia desperately needs a new government.

While the US Foreign Policy is one of promoting democracy, Malaysia has very carefully hidden from the radar and sustained a policy that supports a privileged few.Words like "all men are equal" mean nothing in Malaysia where it promotes a plocy that not only racially discriminates but one that actually oppresses the human rights of the minority.

That is why the United States will never sign a Free Trade Agreement with Malaysia because of the policy of racial discrimination.Malaysia is willing to allow free trade with the USA but not with its local minority.This goes against the very principles and values that the USA stands for and contradictory to the WTO-non-discriminatory provisions.We dont want to see that a US compnay can bid and receive a contract from Malaysia, when its own people will not be able to do so.

So what is the option for Malaysians-there are two.

Firstly we can emulate the United States (a great country of immigrants) and allow equality among all races while having programs for the poor regardless of race or religion.The best will serve the nation on merit.

The other option is to become like Zimbabwe, and have a ruling party since independence run the coutry to the ground. Both the United States and Zimbabwe have minorities.The USA went on merit and made a minority black American the United States President.

In Zimbabwe, the minority is the White man and they are now discriminated and put aside-accepting people who are cronies in government policies and decisions.Today Zimbabwe speaks for itself.

I hope Malaysian will walk the right path and see to it that the present government is removed peacefully and democratically.The Malays must continue to speak up at the wrong doings of UMNO because if you dont it will be like "cutting the nose to spite the face" and MPs and members of MIC and MCA should start moving to the opposition en bloc -and join the opposition after another election.We have to remove a cancer that is now intractablly lodge in our democracy.

12/02/10

Malaysian court has ruled that the sultan has the power to dismiss the Chief Minister, which is against the constitution

Eventually, Datuk Seri Mohammad Nizar Jamaluddin has lost the Perak Menteri Besar post and Pakatan Rakyat has failed to retrieve the state power.

The Federal Court’s decision is not surprising and the 5-0 result is less interesting as expected.

As a domestic well-known constitutional scholar said, the whole process is like a strange marriage relationship.

First of all, Nizar (the husband) married the Perak state power (the wife) and later, Datuk Seri Dr Zambry Abdul Kadir got involved in their marriage. As a result, two men were fighting for a woman.

From the legal and ethical points of view, of course such a relationship was not allowed. Therefore, they had to bring it to court, letting the judge to decide who should be the rightful husband.

Before the court decision was made, Dr Zambry has been living together with the Perak state power. They have been constantly making love, regardless whether they did it with mutual willingness or not...oops! I mean a lot of policies have been made and a number of measures have been implemented.

And now, what has been done cannot be undone.

The court ruled that Zambry is the rightful husband, leaving Nizar alone.

Perhaps, we can learn Malaysian political philosophies from the incident.

1. The power of the royal family has become the fourth power

High Court Justice Abdul Aziz Abdul Rahim ruled earlier that Sultan had no power to dismiss a Menteri Besar but only the State Assembly had such a power.

The Court of Appeal then overturned the decision and validated the Sultan’s power, which was also confirmed by the Federal Court.

It will be an important case. From now on, the status of state rulers will be more prominent, especially in a political dead-lock, the ruler may play a key role here.

Under the western democratic framework, the executive, legislative and judicial branches mutually check and balance while the media monitoring system, which was introduced later, has become the fourth power.

The media bring not much effect in Malaysia but the royal power has made a comeback and become the fourth power. However, it is not playing a role to oversee or check and balance. Instead, it will become the “king-maker” during crucial moments.

2.The implementation of democracy cannot be done overnightThe people’s decision made on 8 March has brought a new phenomenon. But the inherent political environment of Malaysia is having a tough inertia. It is attached to the original political structure, eroding many possibilities for changes.

Political frogs and trickery applications are sometimes more effective than the people’s votes.

The implementation of democracy should not rely only on the new phenomena. Instead, they have to continuously move forward and surpass the momentum which is dragging them backward.

We will still have hope only by doing so. — mysinchew.com

* This article is the personal opinion of the writer or publication. The Malaysian Insider does not endorse the view unless specified.

With the ruling Agung has the power to dismiss the PM. So what will happen if the Agung decides to sack the PM. Will BN apply to the court and say that the Agung do not have the power to dismiss the PM. Then how about if the Sultan in the BN ruled states decide to dismiss the the mentri besar, and appoint a PR man as the mentri besar. Will the courts ruled then that the sultan do not have the power to dismiss the CM, or will they refer to the Perak decision and ruled that the sultan has the power to dismiss the BN mentri besar.

A very good precedence for Malaysians to sack Prime Minister in the future.

MI
11/02/10

Malaysia Must Have One Of The MOST Stupid Attorney General IN THE WORLD


Malaysia Must Have One Of The MOST Stupid Attorney General IN THE WORLD

Our Attorney General has undertaken one of the most impossible task ever known to man. The task is to prove, beyond reasonable doubt, that sodomy without penetration had occurred. The impossibility of this task rivals that of a certain virgin giving birth to a child come 3000 years ago.

In fact, more people in the world believes in the Virgin birth of Jesus than Anwar sodomizing Saiful Bukhari. More people in the world can accept that Mary was a virgin when she was pregnant with Jesus than Saiful being sodomized by a man who’s had a spine surgery not too long ago.

I mean, if the attorney general was Chow Kit fish monger, he would’ve dismissed the case right from the start. In other words, a fishmonger in Chow Kit Road market would make a better Attorney General than the one we have right now.

This case is not even worth to be mentioned as a case. Any other courts in the world would have thrown the case out the window faster than you can say “Bingo”. The AG that brings this case to court would’ve been jailed for contempt for wasting the court’s time and insulting the judge’s intelligence.

It shows that our Judiciary system is no different than a brothel and our Judges and Attorney Generals are mere prostitutes. They can be bought at the highest bidder.
I pity our country for having such an imbecile for an Attorney General. But, then again, his being there is just to serve this one purpose, and that is, to destroy Anwar Ibrahim.

The case is crystal clear. THERE WAS NO PENETRATION, therefore, THERE WAS NO SODOMY. And, therefore, S337b DOESN’T APPLY. Any idiot can understand this. Our Attorney General cannot.

OUR ECONOMY WILL BE TORN TO SHREDS BECAUSE OF THIS STUPIDITY

Which investors in their right mind would want to invest in a country where their courts is nothing more than a circus. I mean, there are some 3rd world African countries that has courts better than ours. The Somalian Shariah Court system can deliver better justice than our courts.

Our drying FDI will turn to dust when the verdict on Anwar is delivered. Our investors will run far away and those with money will rather invest in Indonesia. Our domestic investment is already at an all time low and with this case, even our domestic investors will leave the country.

No justice means no civilization means no progress. It’s that simple.
Clearly the people behind this case is not interested in the well being of our economy, in our people’s welfare, in the Malaysian’s image abroad and in humanity.

The same people have the nerve to call themselves Muslims when Islam spits on these types of people. Animals look better than the people behind the entire Saiful Bukhari shenanigans

The entire case will not change the minds of 80% of Malaysians that still believe in Anwar’s innocence. Only the brain-washed UMNO a******s believes in such bull-crap.

MW
10/02/10

Singapore Free Air TV - What does RTM and monopolist Media Prima provides to Indian community?

BOYCOTT MALAYSIAN TV STATIONS CAMPAIGN!!!

BOYCOTT ALL ADVERTISEMENTS SHOWN IN THESE STATIONS - TV1, TV2, TV3, NTV7, TV8 & TV9

WE SHOULD TEACH THESE MORONS A LESSON.

WHY SHOULD YOU VOTE FOR THE GOVERNMENT THAT PRACTICES DISCRIMINATORY POLICIES?

Every Mondays to Fridays Singapore TV station (Vasantham) provides free programmes to Indian communities from 3.00 pm to 12.00 midnight

Every Saturdays and Sundays the programmes starts at 1.00 pm to 12.00 midnight.

Look at the contribution of Malaysian government TV (RTM), TV1 & TV2 serving Indian community in Malaysia.

Malaysian Monopolist Media Prima (TV3, NTV7, TV8 & TV9) serves "0" programmes for Indian community.
How Malaysians watch their pathetic and idiotic programmes?

How shall we deal with these racists?

They are not bothered of the existence of Indian communities in Malaysia.

How does MIC deals with this problem? As usual no issue for them.

It is high time for Indians to demand for a FREE AIR TV station for their own community as they have been deprived by their own government to serve minority community.

If Singapore government is very concerned of minority community, why not Malaysian govt. Why Malaysian govt has to practice discriminatory policies?

Vasantham: Singapore Channel E24 (Tamil)

All Indians in Malaysia should unite to overcome the discrimination towards Indians in Malaysia.

mi1 is going to highlight this issue until 13th General Election and till Indians in Malaysia been awarded a new Free air TV station from Malaysian government.


Companies that practices discrimination against minorities

Google