UMNO and AG frightened to give documents on police shoot to kill cum murder and murders in police custody.
The charge sheet against P. Uthayakumar specifically was underlined on the words “Every week one person at average is killed in a shoot to kill policy and in every 2 weeks one person killed in police custody” . About 60% of these victims are Indians though they form only 8% of the Malaysian population”.
This is a very serious case of “ethnic cleansing” of the Indians in Malay-sian. But UMNO and the Malay-sian police are frightened to furnish the name list of the victims thereto in open Court because the truth about this ethnic cleansing will surface.
The DPP Noorin Badaruddin had the cheek to submit this morning that the truth does not matter but it is Sedition anyway if the aforesaid underlined words are uttered the DPP had cited a line of outdated and obsolete case laws dated back from 100 over years ago during the British colonial era beginning from the case of Queen Emperor V Amba Prasad 1898.
N. Surendran submitted that P. Uthayakumar cannot be sent to jail for merely speaking the truth. Based on this DPP’s submission N. Surendran submitted that then half the country would be in jail for speaking the truth.
P. Uthayakumar then said that in conclusion that if the Attorney General of Malaysia seconds DPP Noorin Badaruddin for the Attorney General’s job in Zimbabwe, then P. Uthayakumar would be more than happy to endorse the same.
The court was adjourned at 11.42 a.m and fixed 3.00 p.m for decision.
At 3.00 p.m the Judge ruled that the documents on the deaths in custody and by police shooting according to ethnic origins, age and numbers But the DCP tried evading that he does not have the facts and figures P. Uthayakumar and N.Surendren somehow cornered him into answering are to be given to the Court. But we will have to wait until the next hearing date what staunts will be pulled up by the police and the AGP and DPP.
In the afternoon session DCP Mohd Acryl Sani Abdullah Sani continued answering P. Uthayakumar’s questions. When asked how many Hindraf supporters were injured on 25/11/2007 he replied that one civilian and one policeman P. Uthayakumar ticked him off by saying “jangan tunjuk belang polis, soalan saya penyokong Hindraf bukan polis”.
The Court disallowed P. Uthayakumar’s application for the Intelligence report on the number of injured Hindraf supporters based also on the police video recording and photographs after the DPP submitted that it is “ Rahsia Besar” .
This Court’s decision was also despite P. Uthayakumar’s submission that “Logic and common sense would dictate that the injury to the ordinary man cannot be a “rahsia besar” unless it is to cover up the police crime and abuse of power.
P. Uthayakumar also suggested that the police are so used to getting away with “short cuts” and getting people convicted that they don’t want to tender the full evidence in Court.
On whether ASP Vasanthakumar’s job scope under Ops Padam (eliminate) Hindraf is to create confusion and to break up the strength of Hindraf, DCP Acryl replied he does not know.
On P. Uthayakumar having already been punished without trial for 514 days and now this Sedition trial will be Double Jeopordy ie punished twice for the same offence ie the 25th November Hindraf Rally, the DCP disagreed.
HRP
15/01/2010
The charge sheet against P. Uthayakumar specifically was underlined on the words “Every week one person at average is killed in a shoot to kill policy and in every 2 weeks one person killed in police custody” . About 60% of these victims are Indians though they form only 8% of the Malaysian population”.
This is a very serious case of “ethnic cleansing” of the Indians in Malay-sian. But UMNO and the Malay-sian police are frightened to furnish the name list of the victims thereto in open Court because the truth about this ethnic cleansing will surface.
The DPP Noorin Badaruddin had the cheek to submit this morning that the truth does not matter but it is Sedition anyway if the aforesaid underlined words are uttered the DPP had cited a line of outdated and obsolete case laws dated back from 100 over years ago during the British colonial era beginning from the case of Queen Emperor V Amba Prasad 1898.
N. Surendran submitted that P. Uthayakumar cannot be sent to jail for merely speaking the truth. Based on this DPP’s submission N. Surendran submitted that then half the country would be in jail for speaking the truth.
P. Uthayakumar then said that in conclusion that if the Attorney General of Malaysia seconds DPP Noorin Badaruddin for the Attorney General’s job in Zimbabwe, then P. Uthayakumar would be more than happy to endorse the same.
The court was adjourned at 11.42 a.m and fixed 3.00 p.m for decision.
At 3.00 p.m the Judge ruled that the documents on the deaths in custody and by police shooting according to ethnic origins, age and numbers But the DCP tried evading that he does not have the facts and figures P. Uthayakumar and N.Surendren somehow cornered him into answering are to be given to the Court. But we will have to wait until the next hearing date what staunts will be pulled up by the police and the AGP and DPP.
In the afternoon session DCP Mohd Acryl Sani Abdullah Sani continued answering P. Uthayakumar’s questions. When asked how many Hindraf supporters were injured on 25/11/2007 he replied that one civilian and one policeman P. Uthayakumar ticked him off by saying “jangan tunjuk belang polis, soalan saya penyokong Hindraf bukan polis”.
The Court disallowed P. Uthayakumar’s application for the Intelligence report on the number of injured Hindraf supporters based also on the police video recording and photographs after the DPP submitted that it is “ Rahsia Besar” .
This Court’s decision was also despite P. Uthayakumar’s submission that “Logic and common sense would dictate that the injury to the ordinary man cannot be a “rahsia besar” unless it is to cover up the police crime and abuse of power.
P. Uthayakumar also suggested that the police are so used to getting away with “short cuts” and getting people convicted that they don’t want to tender the full evidence in Court.
On whether ASP Vasanthakumar’s job scope under Ops Padam (eliminate) Hindraf is to create confusion and to break up the strength of Hindraf, DCP Acryl replied he does not know.
On P. Uthayakumar having already been punished without trial for 514 days and now this Sedition trial will be Double Jeopordy ie punished twice for the same offence ie the 25th November Hindraf Rally, the DCP disagreed.
HRP
15/01/2010
No comments:
Post a Comment