Kuala Lumpur: Opposition politicians today charged that Petronas' 84-page 2007 annual report available on its official website does not reveal adequate details and the public deserved full diclosure.
Penang Chief Minister and DAP secretary-general Lim Eng Guan, a trained accountant, said: "The report only gives a snapshot view and detailed expenditure is not made transparent. We want to know whether unecessary expenditure like lavish banquets and private jets had been spent.
"DAP has been pressing for detailed accounts since 1986. The annual report was only made available on the Petronas website three years ago."
Petronas chief executive officer Tan Sri Mohd Hassan Merican was reported today as saying Petronas has been publishing its annual report for the past 18 years and is easily available. This was in response to queries by various quarters both Opposition and Barisan Nasional that the national petroleum corporation's accounts be made public.
Parti Keadilan Raykat (PKR) treasurer William Leong, who is also Selayang MP, also expressed similar concerns. "We know that a sizeable amount is given to the government but we would like to know how that money has been spent. Even if the money has gone to certain activies like Formula One, we would like the detailed breakdown. Financial details like rescuing Bank Bumiputra have never been disclosed."
Umno Youth vice-chief and Rembau MP Khairy Jamaluddin was also reported over the weekend calling for Petronas' accounts to be made public. He reportedly said he would raise the issue in Parliament because the public wanted to know why the national oil corporation was unable to absorb the rising cost of fuel despite the profits.
Under the Petroleum Development Act 1974, Petronas is obligated to pay the government taxes, dividends, royalties and duties Over the last 33 years some RM336 billion was channelled back to the government. Hassan was reported saying that for financial year 2007, RM52.3billion or 66.2% of the total profit was paid to the Government as tax, dividends, royalties and export duties. Hassan, has also been reported saying that that it was the governments responsibility to respond to how that money is allocated.
In GEORGE TOWN, Lim lashed out at Petronas directors, calling on them to stop living and behaving “like kings”.
"Theublic needed to know how many private jets and expensive cars the company’s directors and top management had bought and used. hile everyone else is suffering during the current financial difficulty, they are enjoying themselves,” he added. "It's very un-Malaysian."
He said the directors should instead let the national oil company share its profits with the public during this trying period in the nation’s history.
"Why is money not channelled to the masses?” he said. “As long as Petronas does not share its profit, it is working against national interest."
Lim spoke to reporters after witnessing the signing ceremony between Axon and SAP on SAP Education Partnership here.
"Petronas must realise that there is mounting public anger against it. We did not hear in the past of people boycotting Petronas," he said, noting a growing email and SMS campaign asking Malaysians to boycott Petronas stations.
Lim said the financial statement in the report on Petronas' website was not exactly public.
"Releasing information in bulk and in general terms does not really throw any light on how the expenses are accounted for," he said.
Lim also queried the RM500 million spent by Petronas to maintain the Malaysian Philharmonic Orchestra of which more than 90% are foreign musicians.
"Who authorised you to spend the money? Are you accountable to yourself or to the prime minister?" he asked.
The Sun
18/06/08
1 comment:
There is a difference between UMNO and Barisan Nasional. I want to make it clear that it is not the Barisan Nasional (BN) government, but the UMNO government. It is not the government, but UMNO. Barisan Nasional is a coalition of unequals, not equals. UMNO is the big brother in BN. Therefore UMNO must be held responsible; and more importantly, UMNO must not be allowed to hide behind the BN banner. UMNO is the enemy, not BN.
I have come to the conclusion that the easy solution is to completely defeat UMNO in the next elections.
In the 2004 elections (11th General Election), the voters gave good support to Mr.Abdullah Badawi. But reforms did not come. Why? Probably because UMNO had done well in the elections. If UMNO had done well in the elections, then the election results tell UMNO that the voters are satisfied with the status quo. If the voters are satisfied with UMNO, then no reforms are necessary. In the 2008 elections (12th General Elections), UMNO did not do well, but she managed to win. UMNO did lose the 2/3 majority in the Parliament, but she did win, nevertheless. Will UMNO undertake reforms now? I would not be surprised if she did not. Why should she? UMNO is still the winner in the elections; and she can plan to rise and may even succeed to rise again. So, as long as she wins, she will never undertake the reforms. So, how do the voters get the reforms that they need? The voters will get the reforms when UMNO is completely defeated in the 13th General Elections. If UMNO wins zero seats in the next elections (13th General Elections), then some other party would have to rule Malaysia. Let us call it Party B. If UMNO is completely defeated in the next elections (13th General Elections), then Party B would rule Malaysia. Would Party B undertake reforms? If Party B does not undertake reforms, then voters would know what to do.
So, the next step for Malaysians is to completely defeat UMNO in the next elections.
Post a Comment