So where is Bala?

In the light of Razak Baginda's press statement, this appears to be his
version of the current state of play (if I read what he is saying
correctly):

Baginda is not involved.

Najib and Rosmah had never met Altantuya.

It had nothing to do with an arms deal. Baginda only met Altantuya later.

Bloggers have been spreading lies.

Two men are now in court in the Altantuya case; so he can't say much in the interests of "legal ethics".

That leaves at least two simple but unanswered questions:

Why was she killed?

And where is Bala?

Minister says cops met PI Bala in Bangkok
Home Minister Syed Hamid Albar revealed that the police last met 'missing'private investigator S Balasubramaniam in Bangkok on July 7.

The minister said this in his Parliamentary written reply to Tian Chua (PKR-Batu) dated Nov 13.

The PKR politician had asked about Balasubramaniam's whereabouts and if he had been given police protection.

"The police does not have information of his current whereabouts. The last time he was detected was on July 7, 2008 when his statement was recorded in Bangkok," wrote Syed Hamid.

'Razak, don't tell us who's not involved'
'I know that I am not involved, everybody else is also not involved. The real murderer, too, is not involved as he would never admit his involvement.'

On Abdul Razak: Najib not involved
Ranjeet: Razak Baginda, since you can vouch for Najib and Rosmah, then I assume that you know the full story behind the murder of Altantunya.

Don't tell us who is not involved. I know that I am not involved, everybody else is also not involved. The real murderer too is not involved as he would never admit his involvement.

Then, Razak Baginda, tell us who is involved. Tell us also where is Balasubramaniam.

If you do not know, then we are not interested inyou. Just thank your luck that you're acquitted and that you were lucky enough to be born in Malaysia the Bolehland.

John Tan: The truth is no one knows what the truth is. But from the manner which the prosecution team worked on the case, it gives the general perception that they are not doing enough to uncover the truth.

Among others, one question that needs to be answered is how did Altantuya's immigration records disappear?

Whoever authorised and instructed this move must have had a reason to have her records erased and must wield considerable authority to be able to get this done.

Moreover, if Altantuya's remains were not discovered, no one would even know that she ever entered Malaysia. So a very important angle was not even investigated.

Millionth Citizen: Of course, Najib and Rosmah are not involved. After all, who's hand was it that made your acquittal possible?

And why are we not surprised that you were to be the gifted one to tell the world that they are not involved? As has been said before, you being found not guilty was a foregone conclusion.

And only the same hand that got you acquitted could delete the arrival records of the deceased, the disappearance of a vital witness, providing the C4 and even arrest RPK.

The fun is only just beginning. Let's wait for the outcome of the trial of the remaining accused. The wayang kulit show has just started.

One way or another only god can sanction the punishment for such a sin as this killing.

Sang Kancil
Razak Baginda with a french beard simply showed that he is not real and sincere in his statement. A true Muslim or shall I say, human being, will not tell lies.

Where is your integrity? So who gave the instruction to use the C4? Who erased the immigration records of Altantuya?

We Malaysian are not stupid. Remember, you will have to face Allah on Judgement Day. What are you going to tell Him?

CK: Razak Baginda,, my advice to you is to go and seek repentance from your God and atone for your sins.

Your revelations are tainted and will only create more suspicion in the eyes of the public as you have no credibility in the court of public opinion.

Since your imprisonment over the last two years, we have seen enough incidents to realise that things are not what they seem.

Too many questions are left unanswered and you are the last person to provide the answers.

Go complete your course at Oxford or Cambridge and leave the us alone to tackle the economic malaise that's upon us.

Karpal: Abdul Razak PC ill-advised
"Abdul Razak, has by the public statements at the press conference, may well have pre-empted Balasubramaniam and Raja Petra's testimonies and the contents of their statutory declaration.

"The criminal trial at the Shah Alam High Court and the civil suit at the Kuala Lumpur High Court should be allowed to proceed without any comments by any quarter to ensure a fair trial," he said.

Contempt of court?
Stopping short of saying that Abdul Razak may have committed contempt with his press conference, Karpal said the two witnesses could have been called to testify based on the statutory declarations they made.

source: anilNetto
21/11/08