UMNO Treats MIC Like A Pariah Dog In BN and now they have introduced Pariah in education humiliating further.
It has been a known fact for a long time that Umno treats MIC like a Pariah within BN. Thus it comes as no surprise that the Umno owned mouthpiece Utusan Malaysia has been publishing derogatory and at times provocative comments about the MIC, Indians and Hindus and yet gets away with a mere slap on the wrist and continue to do the same the next time around.
Umno also uses it's NGO's to do the same to MIC, Indians and Hindus in the country. Umno has also got it's whore-on-call Ibrahim Katak Ali to do the same.
The Indians in Malaysia who still support MIC must leave the party if they want to save face and restore their dignity for being continually being humiliated by Big Brother Umno. Any Indian who feels MIC should remain in BN or continues to support BN must surely be a Pariah.
The problem with our present educationists and politicians is that they all have peanut brains! We never had problems with ethnic relations or the education system in the Sixties or early Seventies until some smart politicians and educationists came up with stupid education policies which have now turned our education system into the butt of jokes.
We have varsity graduates who cannot even write a decent job application letter in either English or Bahasa. History, according to our peanut brained educationists and politicians, should portray the true story and not be distorted. Okay, so what's the problem to mention in the text book that the founder of Malacca was a Hindu prince from Palembang. Why hide this fact. The fact that he converted to Islam just for the sake of a woman should not be a reason to hide this fact. Aaah, what can we say about our peanut-brained politicians and educationists. God have mercy on our education system!
We are all immigrants squatting in this country. Only the Negrito, Jekun, Semang, Jahut, Orang Laut, Orang Darat, Senoi, and other indigenous people groups (like the Kadazandusuns, ibans and bidayuhs) can be correctly considered the original inhabitants of this country.
On page 212, Maniam was told (assuming in Tamil) by a fellow passenger on a ship during the trip to Malaya in 1910…"Orang bumiputera negeri itu baik-baik belaka". Even though it's fiction, the book is trying to ingrain young minds that the Malays were the sole-bumiputra as far as a century ago.
The hotly debated word in the book (in my opinion) imply that the majority Indians in Malaysia are of low caste and untouchable. Though it's fiction, it will attract the same reaction if a similar book with such "degrading word" was mention of other races.
It has been a known fact for a long time that Umno treats MIC like a Pariah within BN. Thus it comes as no surprise that the Umno owned mouthpiece Utusan Malaysia has been publishing derogatory and at times provocative comments about the MIC, Indians and Hindus and yet gets away with a mere slap on the wrist and continue to do the same the next time around.
Umno also uses it's NGO's to do the same to MIC, Indians and Hindus in the country. Umno has also got it's whore-on-call Ibrahim Katak Ali to do the same.
The Indians in Malaysia who still support MIC must leave the party if they want to save face and restore their dignity for being continually being humiliated by Big Brother Umno. Any Indian who feels MIC should remain in BN or continues to support BN must surely be a Pariah.
The problem with our present educationists and politicians is that they all have peanut brains! We never had problems with ethnic relations or the education system in the Sixties or early Seventies until some smart politicians and educationists came up with stupid education policies which have now turned our education system into the butt of jokes.
We have varsity graduates who cannot even write a decent job application letter in either English or Bahasa. History, according to our peanut brained educationists and politicians, should portray the true story and not be distorted. Okay, so what's the problem to mention in the text book that the founder of Malacca was a Hindu prince from Palembang. Why hide this fact. The fact that he converted to Islam just for the sake of a woman should not be a reason to hide this fact. Aaah, what can we say about our peanut-brained politicians and educationists. God have mercy on our education system!
We are all immigrants squatting in this country. Only the Negrito, Jekun, Semang, Jahut, Orang Laut, Orang Darat, Senoi, and other indigenous people groups (like the Kadazandusuns, ibans and bidayuhs) can be correctly considered the original inhabitants of this country.
On page 212, Maniam was told (assuming in Tamil) by a fellow passenger on a ship during the trip to Malaya in 1910…"Orang bumiputera negeri itu baik-baik belaka". Even though it's fiction, the book is trying to ingrain young minds that the Malays were the sole-bumiputra as far as a century ago.
The hotly debated word in the book (in my opinion) imply that the majority Indians in Malaysia are of low caste and untouchable. Though it's fiction, it will attract the same reaction if a similar book with such "degrading word" was mention of other races.
4 comments:
I couldn't agree less with you sir,perhaps mamakthir would be right person to explain this,since his umno evil axis is trained to divide and rule to enrich themselves.umno realised,the Indian are getting united lately for common goal.To get rid of bastard umno,hence there has to be some sort of imbalance.Well said regarding the converts due to woman and perks that come along many immigrants fall for, so called converts with bumiputra.Do not forget bumiputra is indian word.
How shallow your history knowledge!
There is two types of Malays defined by Archaeology: Malay Deutro and Malay Proto. Surf http://mistisfiles.blogspot.com/search?q=Deutro+Proto
Paramesawara and Sang Nila Utama real founder of Singapore, were Hindus but not an Indian. The Malays had been Buddhists too.Check from this blogspot of a Singaporean Chinese-
http://malayubuddha.blogspot.com/2008/09/oldest-malay-kingdom-is-accepted-as.html
Check this one too.. http://dranthonyng.blogspot.com/2006/12/my-stand-on-bumiputra-and-local-born.html
I am so surprised that you don't know. Your parents should have taught you.
Bumiputera is Sanskrit, the Malays had been using Sankrit for generations.
to Suara Ampang Puteri....by the way...you voice-out alone or representing the Puteri community from Ampang?...from here I can see that you are not confident about what you saying - therefor hided your real-self...now back to the topic....yes you are right...the history facts are very true...but at the same time...the malay people have evolved gradually to current state as defined as modern malays...they are mixture of many ethnicities and religions...same goes to other races who have born here in Malaysia since ages....if the malay people can stand up for their rights...then it should equally applied to other races....remember...the earth/universe is belongs to no man but god...about the sanskrit...will you agree if i say that it originated from India?...in India...the people called as indian...so sanskrit is from indian...used by indian...adapted by others....and the name parameswara is name of indian god...so a person who have this name should be an indian...otherwise what would be the reason to have an indian god name for himself?...ps...please correct yourself before correcting others...you should learn from your parents too....
Maybe a dna check on Malaysians will actually show how united we are by blood...by tracing our parentage malays and indians might be the same..
Post a Comment